Brandi Kruse
Politics • Culture • News
Midterm manipulation: Democrats are hoping to gaslight their way to victory
How confusion, deception, and dishonesty became the accepted playbook of a party that claims moral superiority.
November 07, 2022
post photo preview

 

 

From the White House to state houses across the country, Democrats reek of desperation.

To be sure, Republicans have a stench of their own. Some GOP candidates continue to spread false claims about the 2020 election – a storyline so stale that it could cause independent-minded voters to lose their appetite.

Democrats, however, are emitting a more complex odor.

At first whiff, it may seem pleasant – but even crap can be covered with Febreze.

In the lead up to Tuesday’s Midterm election, some Democratic campaigns are relying on confusion, deception, and flat out lies to escape defeat.

To understand the depths of dishonesty, we must start at the top.

President Joe Biden and his administration have taken on the role of liars-in-chief, contorting poor economic news to trick struggling voters into thinking things aren’t all that bad.

In a tweet that has since been deleted, the White House lauded an increase in Social Security for seniors.

“Seniors are getting the biggest increase in their Social Security checks in 10 years through President Biden’s leadership,” the tweet read.

The problem?

Social Security is tied to inflation.

It was such a stunning attempt at gaslighting that Twitter added a fact check to the bottom of it, writing:

“Seniors will receive a large Social Security benefit increase due to the annual cost of living adjustment, which is based on the inflation rate.”

Despite being universally mocked over the tweet, the Biden administration tried its hand again today.

“Right now, the most common price at gas stations across the country is $3.19 per gallon. That's progress,” read a tweet from President Biden’s account.

But, as Twitter noted in yet another fact check, there’s a big difference between “most common price” and “average price.”

“Biden is referring to the ‘most common gas price’ as opposed to the average gas price of $3.80. The most common is the ‘mode’ gas price. Neither are wrong and politicians tend to reference the one that is lower. The mode diminishes high gas states from the equation,” an official Twitter note read, attempting to add context for readers.                   

Let’s be clear: these aren’t white lies from the White House. These are lies directed at Americans who are worried about putting gas in their cars and food on their tables. For someone who claims to have seen his working-class parents struggle to make ends meet, Biden seems to have forgotten the true desperation of poverty.

Or perhaps that desperation is what he’s relying on to make the lies stick.

Sh*t rolls downhill

With a greenlight from the party’s standard bearer, Democrats in races at all levels are treating manipulation as a mandate. The only thing that matters is winning – morals be damned.

Perhaps no candidate reflects that more than the campaign of Clyde Shavers.

Shavers is running for the Washington State House of Representatives in the 10th Legislative District. The position is currently held by Republican Greg Gilday.  

Shavers, a Navy veteran and Yale Law graduate, seemed like a solid contender to flip the seat – with Democrats pouring big money into the race. Shavers even managed to win the endorsement of the district’s newspaper of record,The Everett Herald.

Too bad Shavers turned out to be a pathological liar.

Last week, the Herald pulled its endorsement of Shavers after it was revealed that he lied about working aboard a nuclear submarine and claimed to be an attorney, despite not passing the bar exam.

Because of these misrepresentations, and the questions they raise regarding Shavers’ integrity, the editorial board must rescind its recommendation that voters support Shavers for the state Legislature. Candidates for public office, because of the trust that is required to represent the interests of the residents of one’s district and the state, must be held to a high standard regarding the veracity of their record and their positions. Shavers has violated that trust.

In a normal political environment, that might be it for Clyde Shavers.

But of course, this isn’t a normal political environment. This is Bullshitville and Shavers is the mayor.

Besides, Democrats have spent too much on the seat to give up now!

What followed in the days after Shavers’ lies were exposed has been nothing short of stunning. If control of the Washington State Legislature didn’t hang in the balance, I might even commend Shavers for his commitment to the con.

Instead of offering voters an apology, Shavers took to social media to gaslight them ever further – lying about what he was accused of lying about.

Stick with me here, because this is a maze of manipulation.

“I have now been accused of not graduating from Yale Law School – well, here’s my diploma,” Shavers wrote on Facebook, posting a picture of his diploma. He went on to lament "divisive politics."

Except no one has claimed he didn’t graduate from law school.

Shavers claimed on multiple occasions that he was an attorney, which is false. Graduating from law school does not make you an attorney.

In another Facebook post, Shavers again lied about his lies.

“He (Gilday) claims that I didn’t graduate from nuclear power school. I commissioned into the nuclear submarine community after the U.S. Naval Academy and graduated from nuclear power school on February 14, 2014, as shown in my military record. In 2015, I transitioned to serve as a public affairs officer.”

Again, Shavers avoids addressing the actual lie – which is that he claimed, repeatedly, to have served aboard a nuclear submarine for eight years. Exhibits A-C:

To make things worse, a PAC supporting Shavers sent out mailers claiming Rep. Greg Gilday was the actual liar! How dare he lie about a veteran’s service!

Except, of course, Shavers lied about his own service – not to mention he repeatedly told that lie to voters who live in a district that includes Naval Air Station Whidbey Island.

So surely state Democrats would back away from a candidate so morally bankrupt?

Not a chance.

After all, President Biden has made it clear that gaslighting is the name of the game. And make no mistake – that’s what they see this as – a game to be won at any cost.

State Rep. Joe Fitzgibbon, who chairs the House Democratic Campaign Committee, told the Seattle Times that Shavers had “fallen short” by not describing his military record more accurately, but did not call for him to drop out of the race or suggest Dems would pull their support.

“My expectation going forward is that he learn from this,” Fitzgibbon told The Times.

In truth, Democrats don’t see Shavers for Shavers. They see him as a warm body to put in a seat, even if only temporarily.

If Shavers were to win on Tuesday, Democrats could ask him to resign after he takes office and appoint a replacement of their choosing. Who cares if the seat is won by deceiving voters in a military community, right? A win is a win.

A sad attempt at reverse psychology

Don't get me wrong, every election cycle has its share of dishonesty. Political ads with half-truths and missing context are a standard part of the playbook for both parties.

It’s the deviousness of the deception that really stands out this time around.

Case in point: The race for Washington’s Secretary of State – a seat Republicans held for decades but are poised to lose on Tuesday.

In the August primary, Republicans made the rookie mistake of running too many candidates. As a result, they split the vote and allowed a Democrat (Steve Hobbs) and a nonpartisan (Julie Anderson) to advance to the general election.

Anderson seemed poised to win, given her bipartisan appeal. Not only was she expected to pull in some votes from the left, but it made sense that a vast majority of Republican voters would side with her rather than choose a Democrat for the job.

That was until Republican State Rep. Brad Klippert launched a write-in campaign.

While write-in campaigns are nearly impossible to win, Klippert’s presence in the race could siphon just enough votes away from Julie Anderson to hand the seat to Steve Hobbs.

Sensing an opportunity, Washington Governor Jay Inslee and Washington State Democratic Party Chair Tina Podlodowski released a clumsy and scripted social media video – employing reverse psychology to influence the race.

“Brad Klippert has peddled conspiracy theories about how Trump won the 2020 election,” Podlodowski said, saying he'd use the office to promote conspiracies. 

"Whatever you do, do not write in Brad Klippert," Gov. Inslee read from a prepared script while Podlodowski grinned. 

Inslee and Podlodowksi are aware that ordering Republicans NOT to do something is a great way to make sure they do it – especially in the post-pandemic era. 

While some recognized the tactic, others bit.

Brad Klippert’s campaign sent out an email blast celebrating the attention.

“The state’s top Democratic leaders are clearly panicking over the grassroots support the Brad Klippert write-in campaign is receiving from both Republicans and Independents,” the email read.

Tina and Jay must have been overjoyed.

Sure, their tactic could prove successful – but the fact that they've resorted to tricking voters speaks volumes.

But what about the bad orange man?

I can already predict responses to this piece, pointing to the many lies told by former President Donald Trump both on and off the campaign trail.

Don’t get me wrong, if Trump was talking (or tweeting) he was lying or spinning or mischaracterizing. It’s what he did.

But I have news for you: Trump isn’t the president, and Republicans aren’t in power.

Biden and Democrats have spent the past six years claiming the moral high ground and painting the other party as a threat to our very democracy. Surely, they would want to hold themselves to the same standard, right? Or do the ends justify the means?

No matter how you may feel about the Republican Party, there is no denying that Democrats have brought their own party to a new low this election cycle – and voters should take the gaslighting as a personal insult to their intelligence. No one who thinks you're that stupid deserves something as important as your vote.

In the final days before the election, consider how we got here and how we can get out. 

To fix the sad state of elections, we must reset our expectations.

If we let politicians treat us like we’re morons, we have no one to blame but ourselves.

If we let elected leaders gaslight us into believing their lies, we have no one to blame but ourselves. 

If we excuse our own party's despicable tactics because we've convinced ourselves that the other party is worse, we have no one to blame but ourselves once we finally hit rock bottom. 

And if we keep covering up crap with Febreze, it's our own damn fault once the Febreze isn't strong enough to cover the stench. 

 

 

community logo
Join the Brandi Kruse Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
8
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
WATCH: Arrested for keeping secrets (5.21.26)

A local public school superintendent faces a felony charge for allegedly trying to cover up allegations of student assaults. Congress does what Washington state won't do on parental rights. Democrats seem incapable of diagnosing why the party lost to Trump. 

Prefer to listen? https://audioboom.com/posts/8906603-arrested-for-keeping-secrets-5-21-26

01:12:16
WATCH: Not forgotten after all (5.20.26)

Trump’s Department of Justice is targeting several radical policies in Washington state. State lawmaker faces public hearing in ethics probe. Activists demand Seattle mayor declare ‘emergency’ for trans refugees. Gavin Newsom is getting really, really scary.

Prefer to listen? https://audioboom.com/posts/8906058-not-forgotten-after-all-5-20-26

01:05:42
WATCH: How the media weaponizes ‘trans’ (5.19.26)

A trans identity is embraced when sympathetic but ignored when problematic. Washington state spent millions on top and bottom surgeries for prisoners. Seattle mayor claims to regret “bye” comment. Feds charge woman for skid row election fraud.

Prefer to listen? https://audioboom.com/posts/8905576-how-the-media-weaponizes-trans-5-19-26

01:01:32
REMARKS: 'A fundamentally different approach to government'

These remarks were delivered to the Snohomish County Lincoln Day Dinner on May 17, 2024.

REMARKS: 'A fundamentally different approach to government'
'The Final Battle': Remarks to the Whatcom County Republican Party

The following remarks were delivered to the Whatcom County Lincoln Day Dinner on March 23, 2024, in Ferndale, Washington.

I struggled with what to talk to you about tonight. 

Well, that’s not true. I didn't struggle with what to talk to you about – I struggled with whether I was brave enough to say what I wanted to say. 

When I'm invited to speak to groups, I don't want to offend anyone or be too controversial. So, I reached out to a few of your fellow party members to ask whether any topics were off limits or wouldn't go over well with the crowd. 

I got some good advice. 

Then I decided to ignore that good advice entirely.

Too much is at stake to be polite. 

As we sit here tonight, we are in the final battle of a war. 

A war that has pit sanity against insanity. 

Pragmatism against idealism. 

A war that has sacrificed the public good, in favor of a twisted idea of progress.

It's a war that began long before I moved here 15 years ago. It started silently and it was mostly waged in the shadows.

Most of us didn't even realize that a war was being fought. We were too caught up in our own lives and our own problems. ...

'The Final Battle': Remarks to the Whatcom County Republican Party
INTERVIEW: Congressman Dan Newhouse

During a visit to Eastern Washington, Brandi sat down with Congressman Dan Newhouse (R-WA04) to discuss the fentanyl crisis, fuel costs, border security, Chinese land acquisition, and how he was able to survive his vote to impeach Donald Trump.

INTERVIEW: Congressman Dan Newhouse
LIVE: Arrested for keeping secrets (5.21.26)

A local public school superintendent faces a felony charge for allegedly trying to cover up allegations of student assaults. Congress does what Washington state won't do on parental rights. Democrats seem incapable of diagnosing why the party lost to Trump.

LIVE: Not forgotten after all (5.20.26)

Trump’s Department of Justice is targeting several radical policies in Washington state. State lawmaker faces public hearing in ethics probe. Activists demand Seattle mayor declare ‘emergency’ for trans refugees. Gavin Newsom is getting really, really scary.

post photo preview
We fight on – because what other choice is there?
They can try to destroy my reputation. It still won't put them on the right side of history.
 

This week, progressive political strategists launched an effort to undermine my support of citizen initiatives – arguing that my opinions are no longer protected by the First Amendment and should therefore be regulated by the state.

You read that correctly.

In a 24-page complaint to the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission, an obscure organization that styles itself as Washingtonians for Ethical Government called for an immediate investigation into my public support of two voter initiatives that will appear on the ballot in November – one to protect girls' sports, the other to restore parental rights.

Kruse is possibly the most prolific of political content creators in Washington, and her promotions of Let’s Go Washington’s initiatives do not qualify as editorial content. Kruse is not an impartial journalist or just an opinionated member of the public; she is a commercial advertiser with multiple advertisers. Although Kruse was once employed as a reporter by bonafide news outlets, she is no longer commonly considered as a journalist in Washington State and was recently denied press credentials by the Washington State Capitol Correspondents Association, a decision that was upheld by both state and federal courts.

Their argument goes something like this:

  • I host a podcast.

  • My podcast sells spots to advertisers.

  • I endorse products for said advertisers.

  • Therefore, my endorsements have value.

  • Therefore, my political endorsements have value.

  • Therefore, any political endorsements I make must be reported to the Public Disclosure Commission as “in-kind” donations.

There are several factual inaccuracies with the complaint, like the assertion that state and federal courts have determined I’m not a journalist. That is false. While a federal judge declined an emergency motion to have my press pass reinstated in the final days of the 2026 legislative session, our case is ongoing and only in the early stages. I am confident we will prevail.

There are also several legal issues with the complaint, not the least of which is a pesky little thing called the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

But don’t be fooled – the goal of the complaint isn’t for it to stick. The goal is to harm my reputation in the court of public opinion.

Still, for the sake of posterity, it’s worth noting a few things:

The government cannot assign a numerical value to my political speech. Such an act would be extraordinary and without precedent in the history of the United States.

I have never received anything of monetary value to support or oppose any political candidate, initiative, or issue. Quite the contrary. I have given untold hours, made personal donations, and driven tens of thousands of miles around the state to lend my voice to issues and people I believe in.

I have the right to charge advertisers for endorsements, or to provide endorsements free of charge if I wish. And I have. In the years following the pandemic, I featured local small businesses on my show free of charge – and gave them attention on social media, urging followers to support businesses that were struggling to recover from government-imposed lockdowns. I also did this in 2020 while still employed as a news reporter at FOX 13 in Seattle, running a weekly segment on my political show called “Small Business Sunday.”

Providing paid endorsements of products is a common practice in broadcasting and has been for decades. Many of our current advertisers were once endorsed on the radio by the late Dori Monson. Several local radio hosts who endorse products on air have also made public statements about their support of current voter initiatives. Ari Hoffman of KVI and John Curley of KIRO Radio not only endorse products but have stood alongside me in support of girls and parents.

If the Public Disclosure Commission were to rule that my speech must be regulated, it would also have to start regulating the speech of dozens of mainstream radio hosts – and perhaps even the Editorial Board of the Seattle Times.

Beyond that, this issue is settled law in Washington.

The Washington State Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that endorsements from talk show hosts do not constitute in-kind contributions.

At the time, radio hosts John Carlson and Kirby Wilbur were organizing and promoting Initiative 912, aimed at stopping an incremental increase in the gas tax.

'The mere fact that a broadcast has value to a campaign, or includes solicitation of funds, votes, or other support, does not convert commentary into advertising when it occurs during the content portion of a broadcast for which payment is not normally required,' Justice Barbara Madsen wrote for the court.

But again, the point of the complaint is not to upend existing law or get the government to throw the First Amendment to the wind.

The progressive political strategists behind the stunt, Powerhouse Strategic, is the firm used by opponents of the Let’s Go Washington initiatives.

Few news outlets that covered Tuesday’s press release saw fit to mention this connection. Why? It’s not as if it’s a secret. Kristin Hyde, a communications specialist with Powerhouse Strategic, sent the release out with her name and contact information on it.

Powerhouse not only brought previous PDC complaints against Let’s Go Washington, but it also represents the Washington State Democratic Party, as well as two of the largest unions bankrolling the anti-initiative campaigns: SEIU and the Washington Education Association.

1.png?token-hash=Rsuomg_82zpfRv9wDl5Yj5pls7-whh7ucO_ZK0G6vE8%3D&token-time=1779926400

Still, The Seattle Times characterized Washingtonians for Ethical Government (WFEG) only as a “campaign finance watchdog.”

Even if it were a legitimate watchdog group and not a cover for deeply partisan operatives, in the past 10 years it’s only ever questioned the “ethics” of conservatives.

1.png?token-hash=kEF0Gl5391E8QNe-c3xP0lSO4rvB-K86pbSiK_lUup0%3D&token-time=1779926400

In case there was any doubt, I fully intend to continue my work fighting for what I truly believe is the women’s rights issue of our generation: the erasure of girls at the hands of ideologues.

After all, I was fighting this issue long before Let’s Go Washington decided to run initiatives to change state law. In fact, it was through episodes of unDivided that LGW met two of the teen athletes – Ahnaleigh Wilson and Frances Staudt – who would go on to become important voices in the campaign to protect female athletes. I like to think our coverage of the issue is a big reason why voters will get a say in November. I am very proud of that.

1.jpg?token-hash=j3Zy8oY8oJaza2PZlQJDQgdNdSeRb2Z5ArWk7-muENI%3D&token-time=1779926400
Me with Frances Staudt (left) and Ahnaleigh Wilson (right) at a signature gathering event in Issaquah, Washington.

I will also keep fighting for parental rights, as I was before LGW started collecting signatures for a parental bill of rights. My advocacy on this issue goes back to 2023, when I helped a rag-tag group of citizens collect signatures to try to run a referendum on Senate Bill 5599. The law allows children to be hidden from parents if they don’t think their family approves of their gender identity. I was protested, threatened, and called a transphobe. All the usual stuff. The referendum fell short, but my motivation to help parents keep their families together only grew.

1.jpg?token-hash=g-4GoyPQwU1zwfq1NCZjpaAVuIv9Pne4dj5jOTCWOPQ%3D&token-time=1779926400
Protesters greet us outside a coffee shop in Lacey, Washington, where we were collecting signatures to repeal SB 5599.

As I said on my show this week: They can try to bankrupt my business. They can try to destroy my reputation. They can even try to kill me. None of it puts them on the right side of history.

So, we fight on. What other choice is there?

 

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Constitution Wars start NOW!
In response to Governor Bob Ferguson auctioning off a signed copy of the Constitution (blasphemy), we're auctioning off our own to the highest bidder! The winner will get a personalized inscription from Brandi, and she will hand deliver it (within 150 miles). All proceeds from the winning bid will go to We Heart Seattle, as selected by unDivided subscribers. Donations are tax deductible. Place your bid here.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Guest: How to investigate fraud when the media and politicians won't
How a citizen with an art degree uncovered more about potential childcare fraud than the legacy news

About the author: Kristen Magnuson is a Washington state resident and citizen sleuth who helped uncover a troubling pattern with childcare payments in Washington state that mimicked alleged fraud in Minnesota. Follow her work on X at @KristenMag.

 

 

On the morning of December 28, I settled in with a cup of coffee to catch up on the latest Minnesota fraud news. I’d heard rumblings of the scandal for weeks after County Highway and City Journal published pieces describing the schemes in startling detail.

Earlier that week, independent journalist Nick Shirley released a viral video investigating Minneapolis daycare centers, focusing on several owned and operated by members of the Somali community. His videos weren’t definitive proof of fraud, but like many Americans I was left with questions that were too big to ignore.

So, what was I going to do about it?

I’ve always had a knack for pattern recognition and making sense of data. I fully admit I’m not professionally trained in this capacity. I have an art degree. I’m just a concerned citizen who wanted to take a closer look at how our tax dollars are being spent.

Here’s how I went about uncovering suspicious activity that was later highlighted by Elon Musk, viewed by millions of people, and led to on-the-ground investigations by independent journalists (and even some legacy news stations in Seattle). 

It started with a simple search

My initial efforts were not sophisticated. I simply typed ‘childcare wa’ into a search engine. I never anticipated that such a basic exercise in sleuthing would spark the local and national attention that it did.

I landed on the state website for the Department of Children, Youth, and Families (DCYF). Among other things, the site serves as a tool for families to find childcare options. It lists every provider in the state, with information on the owner, address, capacity, inspection history, and language.

I toggled the filter to show daycares participating in the Early Achievers rating program, which is a requirement for receiving state funding. From there, I filtered results to show only the daycare operators listed as speaking Somali.

Is it racist to single out one ethnicity?

The Minnesota fraud scandal had already established a clear pattern of fraud within the Somali community, resulting in multiple prosecutions and guilty pleas.

It’s not racist to explore whether similar patterns might exist in other states, too.

Consider this excerpt from Armin Rosen’s County Highway piece:

If one chooses to inhabit a fact-based world, it is impossible to ignore that the most thoroughly proven frauds, the ones that have dollar amounts and dozens of federal prosecutions attached to them, involve the distribution of social services through organizations serving Somali-Americans.

In a City Journal article, Christopher Rufo highlighted a whistleblower who reported that the Minneapolis Somali fraud ring may have a potential link to Seattle.

According to Glenn Kerns, a retired Seattle Police Department detective who spent 14 years on a federal Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF), the Somalis ran a sophisticated money network, spanning from Seattle to Minneapolis, and were routing significant amounts of cash on commercial flights from the Seattle airport to the hawala networks in Somalia. One of these networks, Kerns discovered, sent $20 million abroad in a single year. 'The amount of money was staggering,' Kerns said.

Ignoring evidence and patterns over concerns about being called racist is how fraud goes unreported and uncovered.

In my initial search of Somali-run daycares in Washington state, I found that of 5,046 total Early Achievers childcare providers, 539 were Somali speaking. That’s more than 10%. Census reports estimate less than .2% of Washington state’s population is of Somali descent.

That seemed oddly disproportionate, so I posted a scrolling video on X to show what I found.

Hours later, I casually checked my notifications while at the grocery store and saw that Elon Musk replied! Millions of people were suddenly interested in what I’d uncovered with a simple search of publicly available data.

 

Day 1: Investigating on the ground

The day after my X post went viral, independent journalist Jonathan Choe pulled up to my house. We spent the next four hours driving all over town investigating daycares in person. I’d never done anything like it.

While state leaders, including Washington’s Attorney General and several Democrats in the legislature, would later accuse us of harassing daycare owners, we did no such thing. We were friendly. We knocked on doors. We politely asked for an application to enroll a child. Many of the people who came to the door were friendly in return.

At the first daycare, a woman invited us inside for a tour. There were activity tables with child-sized chairs, nap mats neatly stacked, art on the walls, age-appropriate books arranged on a shelf.

While everything looked legitimate, the woman would not give us an application, and I noted that only one child was present at the time.

As we ventured to other locations, we encountered some obvious red flags. Windows fully covered, no signage, and very few outdoor play areas. Most of the people who answered the door told us the owner was not there. They asked us to come back another time. Most significantly, we rarely saw or heard any kids.

At the last spot a woman spoke to us through a doorbell camera.

“We don’t have childcare,” she said.

The windows were fully covered.

 

Day 2: Trouble with the police

On our second day visiting Somali-run daycares listed on the state website, we met up with local journalist Carleen Johnson of The Center Square.

At one site, a woman spoke to us from behind a closed door. She wasn’t willing to give us an application. We asked a few more brief questions, thanked her, and started walking away. Shortly after, two women came out of the house to scold us.

Someone had called the police.

A responding officer assured us that we were not trespassing or doing anything wrong. The women allowed him to look inside the home, and he confirmed that there were kids inside.

The hostility was surprising. By then, a local KOMO News reporter was doing similar work – knocking on doors and asking questions. Basic shoe-leather journalism. Not harassment. Not racism.

We continued throughout the city. Some of the places we visited looked like real daycares, but many did not.

We detailed our findings on social media.

 

Day 3: Where has all the money gone?

We began looking deeper into the publicly available spending data on the Washington State Fiscal Information website. This site, also known as Open Checkbook, discloses provider payments by month and fiscal year. Our third day was focused on visits to providers that received significant amounts of funding.

Another independent journalist, Cam Higby, was with us as well.

Many of these small home daycares were receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer funds each year – some got more than a million. Keep in mind that most of these daycares have a maximum capacity of 12 children.

At one address we visited, a man spoke to us from a porch camera. He told us it was not a daycare.

Another alleged daycare was listed at the address of a small, run-down house. The windows were covered. We didn’t see or hear any children. Besides a tattered basketball hoop sitting in a mud puddle at the edge of the property, there was no play equipment. The woman who answered the door was friendly but declined to provide us with any information or an application.

Our team asked two neighbors if they had seen kids at the house and if they were aware it was registered as a daycare.

Both neighbors said no.

Yet, according to state data, the childcare provider listed at that address receives six-figure monthly payments, bringing in over $160,000 in July alone.

As I expanded my research, I checked out the state’s most recent audit. The Washington State Auditor’s Office reviews federal funding annually. Findings are published in a formal report, with highlights summarized on the auditor’s website. The 2024 fiscal year audit exposed significant concerns, including a whopping $416 million dollars in “unauditable” DCYF spending.

The audit revealed that DCYF repeatedly failed to comply with reporting requirements and had more audit “findings” than any other agency.

Despite being given corrective actions to take, similar findings have plagued DCYF for years.

“For the fourth year in a row, we are questioning all childcare payments from the Child Care and Development Fund at the Department of Children, Youth, and Families,” the Auditor’s Office stated.

Read that again. The auditor’s office has questioned ALL federal childcare payments to DCYF for the past four years. Hundreds of millions of dollars in questionable payments.

How is such a blatant failure to follow reporting requirements or enact corrective action even allowed?

I posted a thread summarizing the audit findings on X. Before long, other news outlets and political figures were amplifying what I found.

The strange thing is that the audit findings were never private or hard to uncover. They were right there on a government website for all to see, for years. Why did it take a citizen with an art degree in Washington state to shed light on them?

Knowledge is power, but what comes next?

I want to be clear that I am not alleging fraud at any of these daycares. I do not have the tools or authority to do so. But we, as citizens, do have the tools to spot concerning patterns and question government oversight of our money.

Thanks to social media, we can amplify our concerns so that officials who do have the tools and authority to investigate can be pressured to do so.

State officials have seemingly ignored these red flags for years. Our questions and concerns are fair. We are not racists for recognizing patterns and asking questions.

Our elected officials owe us transparency – and if the media won’t demand it, we should.

About the author: Kristen Magnuson is a Washington state resident and citizen sleuth who helped uncover a troubling pattern with childcare payments in Washington state that mimicked alleged fraud in Minnesota. Follow her work on X at @KristenMag.

 

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals