Brandi Kruse
Politics • Culture • News
[un]Divided Newsletter: January 8, 2023
January 08, 2023
post photo preview

 

 

Take a minute to [un]wind with our Sunday newsletter. Grab a cup of coffee and catch up on what you may have missed from [un]Divided this week and what is coming up in the week ahead. 

Remembering Dori Monson

From the bottom of my heart, thank you for your kind words during a difficult week. It has been so uplifting to hear what Dori meant to all of you. His loss not only leaves a void for those who loved him, but a huge void in the Seattle media landscape.

If you missed it, you can read my tribute to Dori here

1.jpg?token-time=1674432000&token-hash=a_uHdyzCyoq6AxZ8PJgLfU_WAzY4mYVtYfcUFKQi3Z0%3D

Legislative session

The 2023 legislative session gets underway on Monday in Olympia. If you want to hear what lawmakers and the governor had to say about what’s to come, I highly recommend taking some time to watch Friday’s legislative preview. Legislative leaders discuss their priorities starting at the 33:00 mark, budget writers from both parties speak at the 1:08:00 mark, and Governor Jay Inslee offers remarks at 1:55:00.

Also featured in the preview was pollster Stuart Elway, who offered some interesting takeaways about what voters want to see accomplished this year.

Of 403 registered Washington voters who were polled last month, 34% said the economy should be a top priority for lawmakers, including addressing inflation and housing costs.

Public safety was second on the list, at 23%, followed by homelessness (22%), and taxes (17%).

Just 2% of respondents said COVID-19 should be a top priority. Praise be.

1.png?token-time=1674432000&token-hash=Isum5pYTYg39fT0F3puv1y3sNMNYrAzDGZAzpz5KHFw%3D

Read the entire Crosscut/Elway poll here.

One little stat that also stands out to me from the poll is this one:

1.png?token-time=1674432000&token-hash=DbQyZHeF5aheiLjIZkbhsZ7sI2txxzOF45FROKqpCuw%3D

So let me try to understand this. Only 13% of respondents believe Inslee is doing an “excellent” job as governor, yet 34% are already willing to say they would support him for an unprecedented FOURTH term? That’s insane.

I should note that I believe there is a 0% chance of Inslee running again, but why would anyone want the same person to run the state for 16 years?

"Legislative privilege"

An issue you are going to hear a lot about in the coming weeks is the concept of legislative privilege, so let me get you up to speed with what’s going on so you can tell all your friends about how terrible it is. 

One of the most effective ways the public and the press alike can access information about what is happening behind the scenes in government is via public disclosure request. Having the ability to request emails, text messages, and other documents that those in power might not want us to see is a critical tool to force transparency.

A few years ago, there was a battle in Washington state to ensure that lawmakers were subject to the same public records law as everyone else in government. In 2018, the state legislature passed a law to exempt themselves from the Public Records Act. Let’s just say, that didn’t go over well. 

More than 20,000 Washingtonians called and emailed to share their objections. The pressure was so intense, Governor Jay Inslee had no choice but to veto the bill. Media organizations then successfully ushered the issue to the Washington State Supreme Court, which ruled in 2019 that lawmakers were, indeed, subject to disclosure.

That should have been the end of things.

Unless you are the majority party, apparently.

On at least three occasions since then, Democrats in Olympia have denied public records requests – citing “legislative privilege.” Except, and this is a big except, no such privilege exists. You will not find it anywhere in the Public Records Act.

In a scathing op-ed this weekend, The Seattle Times Editorial Board explained the bullshit Democrats are trying to pull:

Lawmakers have manufactured it with a tortured reading of Article II, Section 17 of the state Constitution, which reads, “Freedom of Debate. No member of the Legislature shall be liable in any civil action or criminal prosecution whatever, for words spoken in debate.”

 

That’s a sensible provision on its own, one modeled on language in the U.S. Constitution. Lawmakers need the ability to debate without fear of being hauled into court for libel or something else. But it protects debate, not emails, text messages, white papers nor any other public record. In fact, and this is significant: It doesn’t even allow the debate to be secret, just immune from being the grounds for a court action.

 

Therein lies the gaslighting. Lawmakers didn’t formally announce this radical reinterpretation of the state Constitution. They just started invoking it as if it had been there all along. They want to trick Washingtonians into believing that this is nothing unusual.

 

But it is unusual. It’s insulting, exasperating and profoundly troubling. So far, the privilege has been invoked on the advice of attorneys of the House and Senate Democratic caucuses.

So, what can we do?

Unfortunately, the only path forward is a legal one. News agencies will once again have to force the issue to court, likely resulting in a costly and completely unnecessary legal battle – the price of which will be paid by taxpayers.

Every single Washingtonian should be pissed about this. Make your voices heard. Reach out to the House Speaker and Senate Leader to demand their caucuses follow the law. Keep your emails and phone calls civil, but don't let them off the hook. They work for you, after all. 

 

 

Hope for Seattle

I went to a dinner last night that gives me so much hope for the future of Seattle.

The Seattle Leadership Retreat was a gathering of advocacy leaders from all over North America – California, Canada, New York, Colorado, Oregon – who are pushing for common sense solutions to the drug crisis that has taken over our streets.

The event was put together by We Heart Seattle, a citizen-led group of volunteers who started by picking up trash at homeless camps.

1.jpg?token-time=1674432000&token-hash=hf4xVsvi4UO7dEkFnQKmpVZ6r85wvcWtuVj7qGQ5xOU%3D

Last night’s featured speaker was Michael Shellenberger, author of San Fransicko: Why Progressives Ruin Cities.  Shellenberger was also one of the independent journalists recently tapped by Elon Musk to share “The Twitter Files.”

“Our civilization is at stake,” Shellenberger told the crowd, railing against what he called “pathological altruism” – the misguided belief that letting people live in squalor and addiction on our streets is somehow empathetic or righteous. 

“We are going to save our cities by saving our fellow human beings,” he concluded.

Never have I been in a room of people so committed to telling the truth about our homeless crisis and dedicating themselves to being part of the solution. The commonsense movement is catching on. Keep pushing. Keep saying what needs to be said. 

Housekeeping

Starting Monday, I’ll be temporarily hosting on KIRO Radio from 12-3pm. The station has big shoes to fill, and I share your hope that they can find someone who is dedicated to being a watchdog of government. There is simply no replacement for Dori Monson. As for me, I am committed to continuing to grow [un]Divided. There will be no changes to our weekly [un]Divided lineup as I help my friends at KIRO Radio for a few weeks.

Thank you for your commitment to giving common sense a comeback! Have a great week.

 

 

community logo
Join the Brandi Kruse Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
5
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
WATCH: Arrested for keeping secrets (5.21.26)

A local public school superintendent faces a felony charge for allegedly trying to cover up allegations of student assaults. Congress does what Washington state won't do on parental rights. Democrats seem incapable of diagnosing why the party lost to Trump. 

Prefer to listen? https://audioboom.com/posts/8906603-arrested-for-keeping-secrets-5-21-26

01:12:16
WATCH: Not forgotten after all (5.20.26)

Trump’s Department of Justice is targeting several radical policies in Washington state. State lawmaker faces public hearing in ethics probe. Activists demand Seattle mayor declare ‘emergency’ for trans refugees. Gavin Newsom is getting really, really scary.

Prefer to listen? https://audioboom.com/posts/8906058-not-forgotten-after-all-5-20-26

01:05:42
WATCH: How the media weaponizes ‘trans’ (5.19.26)

A trans identity is embraced when sympathetic but ignored when problematic. Washington state spent millions on top and bottom surgeries for prisoners. Seattle mayor claims to regret “bye” comment. Feds charge woman for skid row election fraud.

Prefer to listen? https://audioboom.com/posts/8905576-how-the-media-weaponizes-trans-5-19-26

01:01:32
REMARKS: 'A fundamentally different approach to government'

These remarks were delivered to the Snohomish County Lincoln Day Dinner on May 17, 2024.

REMARKS: 'A fundamentally different approach to government'
'The Final Battle': Remarks to the Whatcom County Republican Party

The following remarks were delivered to the Whatcom County Lincoln Day Dinner on March 23, 2024, in Ferndale, Washington.

I struggled with what to talk to you about tonight. 

Well, that’s not true. I didn't struggle with what to talk to you about – I struggled with whether I was brave enough to say what I wanted to say. 

When I'm invited to speak to groups, I don't want to offend anyone or be too controversial. So, I reached out to a few of your fellow party members to ask whether any topics were off limits or wouldn't go over well with the crowd. 

I got some good advice. 

Then I decided to ignore that good advice entirely.

Too much is at stake to be polite. 

As we sit here tonight, we are in the final battle of a war. 

A war that has pit sanity against insanity. 

Pragmatism against idealism. 

A war that has sacrificed the public good, in favor of a twisted idea of progress.

It's a war that began long before I moved here 15 years ago. It started silently and it was mostly waged in the shadows.

Most of us didn't even realize that a war was being fought. We were too caught up in our own lives and our own problems. ...

'The Final Battle': Remarks to the Whatcom County Republican Party
INTERVIEW: Congressman Dan Newhouse

During a visit to Eastern Washington, Brandi sat down with Congressman Dan Newhouse (R-WA04) to discuss the fentanyl crisis, fuel costs, border security, Chinese land acquisition, and how he was able to survive his vote to impeach Donald Trump.

INTERVIEW: Congressman Dan Newhouse
LIVE: Arrested for keeping secrets (5.21.26)

A local public school superintendent faces a felony charge for allegedly trying to cover up allegations of student assaults. Congress does what Washington state won't do on parental rights. Democrats seem incapable of diagnosing why the party lost to Trump.

LIVE: Not forgotten after all (5.20.26)

Trump’s Department of Justice is targeting several radical policies in Washington state. State lawmaker faces public hearing in ethics probe. Activists demand Seattle mayor declare ‘emergency’ for trans refugees. Gavin Newsom is getting really, really scary.

post photo preview
We fight on – because what other choice is there?
They can try to destroy my reputation. It still won't put them on the right side of history.
 

This week, progressive political strategists launched an effort to undermine my support of citizen initiatives – arguing that my opinions are no longer protected by the First Amendment and should therefore be regulated by the state.

You read that correctly.

In a 24-page complaint to the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission, an obscure organization that styles itself as Washingtonians for Ethical Government called for an immediate investigation into my public support of two voter initiatives that will appear on the ballot in November – one to protect girls' sports, the other to restore parental rights.

Kruse is possibly the most prolific of political content creators in Washington, and her promotions of Let’s Go Washington’s initiatives do not qualify as editorial content. Kruse is not an impartial journalist or just an opinionated member of the public; she is a commercial advertiser with multiple advertisers. Although Kruse was once employed as a reporter by bonafide news outlets, she is no longer commonly considered as a journalist in Washington State and was recently denied press credentials by the Washington State Capitol Correspondents Association, a decision that was upheld by both state and federal courts.

Their argument goes something like this:

  • I host a podcast.

  • My podcast sells spots to advertisers.

  • I endorse products for said advertisers.

  • Therefore, my endorsements have value.

  • Therefore, my political endorsements have value.

  • Therefore, any political endorsements I make must be reported to the Public Disclosure Commission as “in-kind” donations.

There are several factual inaccuracies with the complaint, like the assertion that state and federal courts have determined I’m not a journalist. That is false. While a federal judge declined an emergency motion to have my press pass reinstated in the final days of the 2026 legislative session, our case is ongoing and only in the early stages. I am confident we will prevail.

There are also several legal issues with the complaint, not the least of which is a pesky little thing called the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

But don’t be fooled – the goal of the complaint isn’t for it to stick. The goal is to harm my reputation in the court of public opinion.

Still, for the sake of posterity, it’s worth noting a few things:

The government cannot assign a numerical value to my political speech. Such an act would be extraordinary and without precedent in the history of the United States.

I have never received anything of monetary value to support or oppose any political candidate, initiative, or issue. Quite the contrary. I have given untold hours, made personal donations, and driven tens of thousands of miles around the state to lend my voice to issues and people I believe in.

I have the right to charge advertisers for endorsements, or to provide endorsements free of charge if I wish. And I have. In the years following the pandemic, I featured local small businesses on my show free of charge – and gave them attention on social media, urging followers to support businesses that were struggling to recover from government-imposed lockdowns. I also did this in 2020 while still employed as a news reporter at FOX 13 in Seattle, running a weekly segment on my political show called “Small Business Sunday.”

Providing paid endorsements of products is a common practice in broadcasting and has been for decades. Many of our current advertisers were once endorsed on the radio by the late Dori Monson. Several local radio hosts who endorse products on air have also made public statements about their support of current voter initiatives. Ari Hoffman of KVI and John Curley of KIRO Radio not only endorse products but have stood alongside me in support of girls and parents.

If the Public Disclosure Commission were to rule that my speech must be regulated, it would also have to start regulating the speech of dozens of mainstream radio hosts – and perhaps even the Editorial Board of the Seattle Times.

Beyond that, this issue is settled law in Washington.

The Washington State Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that endorsements from talk show hosts do not constitute in-kind contributions.

At the time, radio hosts John Carlson and Kirby Wilbur were organizing and promoting Initiative 912, aimed at stopping an incremental increase in the gas tax.

'The mere fact that a broadcast has value to a campaign, or includes solicitation of funds, votes, or other support, does not convert commentary into advertising when it occurs during the content portion of a broadcast for which payment is not normally required,' Justice Barbara Madsen wrote for the court.

But again, the point of the complaint is not to upend existing law or get the government to throw the First Amendment to the wind.

The progressive political strategists behind the stunt, Powerhouse Strategic, is the firm used by opponents of the Let’s Go Washington initiatives.

Few news outlets that covered Tuesday’s press release saw fit to mention this connection. Why? It’s not as if it’s a secret. Kristin Hyde, a communications specialist with Powerhouse Strategic, sent the release out with her name and contact information on it.

Powerhouse not only brought previous PDC complaints against Let’s Go Washington, but it also represents the Washington State Democratic Party, as well as two of the largest unions bankrolling the anti-initiative campaigns: SEIU and the Washington Education Association.

1.png?token-hash=Rsuomg_82zpfRv9wDl5Yj5pls7-whh7ucO_ZK0G6vE8%3D&token-time=1779926400

Still, The Seattle Times characterized Washingtonians for Ethical Government (WFEG) only as a “campaign finance watchdog.”

Even if it were a legitimate watchdog group and not a cover for deeply partisan operatives, in the past 10 years it’s only ever questioned the “ethics” of conservatives.

1.png?token-hash=kEF0Gl5391E8QNe-c3xP0lSO4rvB-K86pbSiK_lUup0%3D&token-time=1779926400

In case there was any doubt, I fully intend to continue my work fighting for what I truly believe is the women’s rights issue of our generation: the erasure of girls at the hands of ideologues.

After all, I was fighting this issue long before Let’s Go Washington decided to run initiatives to change state law. In fact, it was through episodes of unDivided that LGW met two of the teen athletes – Ahnaleigh Wilson and Frances Staudt – who would go on to become important voices in the campaign to protect female athletes. I like to think our coverage of the issue is a big reason why voters will get a say in November. I am very proud of that.

1.jpg?token-hash=j3Zy8oY8oJaza2PZlQJDQgdNdSeRb2Z5ArWk7-muENI%3D&token-time=1779926400
Me with Frances Staudt (left) and Ahnaleigh Wilson (right) at a signature gathering event in Issaquah, Washington.

I will also keep fighting for parental rights, as I was before LGW started collecting signatures for a parental bill of rights. My advocacy on this issue goes back to 2023, when I helped a rag-tag group of citizens collect signatures to try to run a referendum on Senate Bill 5599. The law allows children to be hidden from parents if they don’t think their family approves of their gender identity. I was protested, threatened, and called a transphobe. All the usual stuff. The referendum fell short, but my motivation to help parents keep their families together only grew.

1.jpg?token-hash=g-4GoyPQwU1zwfq1NCZjpaAVuIv9Pne4dj5jOTCWOPQ%3D&token-time=1779926400
Protesters greet us outside a coffee shop in Lacey, Washington, where we were collecting signatures to repeal SB 5599.

As I said on my show this week: They can try to bankrupt my business. They can try to destroy my reputation. They can even try to kill me. None of it puts them on the right side of history.

So, we fight on. What other choice is there?

 

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Constitution Wars start NOW!
In response to Governor Bob Ferguson auctioning off a signed copy of the Constitution (blasphemy), we're auctioning off our own to the highest bidder! The winner will get a personalized inscription from Brandi, and she will hand deliver it (within 150 miles). All proceeds from the winning bid will go to We Heart Seattle, as selected by unDivided subscribers. Donations are tax deductible. Place your bid here.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Guest: How to investigate fraud when the media and politicians won't
How a citizen with an art degree uncovered more about potential childcare fraud than the legacy news

About the author: Kristen Magnuson is a Washington state resident and citizen sleuth who helped uncover a troubling pattern with childcare payments in Washington state that mimicked alleged fraud in Minnesota. Follow her work on X at @KristenMag.

 

 

On the morning of December 28, I settled in with a cup of coffee to catch up on the latest Minnesota fraud news. I’d heard rumblings of the scandal for weeks after County Highway and City Journal published pieces describing the schemes in startling detail.

Earlier that week, independent journalist Nick Shirley released a viral video investigating Minneapolis daycare centers, focusing on several owned and operated by members of the Somali community. His videos weren’t definitive proof of fraud, but like many Americans I was left with questions that were too big to ignore.

So, what was I going to do about it?

I’ve always had a knack for pattern recognition and making sense of data. I fully admit I’m not professionally trained in this capacity. I have an art degree. I’m just a concerned citizen who wanted to take a closer look at how our tax dollars are being spent.

Here’s how I went about uncovering suspicious activity that was later highlighted by Elon Musk, viewed by millions of people, and led to on-the-ground investigations by independent journalists (and even some legacy news stations in Seattle). 

It started with a simple search

My initial efforts were not sophisticated. I simply typed ‘childcare wa’ into a search engine. I never anticipated that such a basic exercise in sleuthing would spark the local and national attention that it did.

I landed on the state website for the Department of Children, Youth, and Families (DCYF). Among other things, the site serves as a tool for families to find childcare options. It lists every provider in the state, with information on the owner, address, capacity, inspection history, and language.

I toggled the filter to show daycares participating in the Early Achievers rating program, which is a requirement for receiving state funding. From there, I filtered results to show only the daycare operators listed as speaking Somali.

Is it racist to single out one ethnicity?

The Minnesota fraud scandal had already established a clear pattern of fraud within the Somali community, resulting in multiple prosecutions and guilty pleas.

It’s not racist to explore whether similar patterns might exist in other states, too.

Consider this excerpt from Armin Rosen’s County Highway piece:

If one chooses to inhabit a fact-based world, it is impossible to ignore that the most thoroughly proven frauds, the ones that have dollar amounts and dozens of federal prosecutions attached to them, involve the distribution of social services through organizations serving Somali-Americans.

In a City Journal article, Christopher Rufo highlighted a whistleblower who reported that the Minneapolis Somali fraud ring may have a potential link to Seattle.

According to Glenn Kerns, a retired Seattle Police Department detective who spent 14 years on a federal Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF), the Somalis ran a sophisticated money network, spanning from Seattle to Minneapolis, and were routing significant amounts of cash on commercial flights from the Seattle airport to the hawala networks in Somalia. One of these networks, Kerns discovered, sent $20 million abroad in a single year. 'The amount of money was staggering,' Kerns said.

Ignoring evidence and patterns over concerns about being called racist is how fraud goes unreported and uncovered.

In my initial search of Somali-run daycares in Washington state, I found that of 5,046 total Early Achievers childcare providers, 539 were Somali speaking. That’s more than 10%. Census reports estimate less than .2% of Washington state’s population is of Somali descent.

That seemed oddly disproportionate, so I posted a scrolling video on X to show what I found.

Hours later, I casually checked my notifications while at the grocery store and saw that Elon Musk replied! Millions of people were suddenly interested in what I’d uncovered with a simple search of publicly available data.

 

Day 1: Investigating on the ground

The day after my X post went viral, independent journalist Jonathan Choe pulled up to my house. We spent the next four hours driving all over town investigating daycares in person. I’d never done anything like it.

While state leaders, including Washington’s Attorney General and several Democrats in the legislature, would later accuse us of harassing daycare owners, we did no such thing. We were friendly. We knocked on doors. We politely asked for an application to enroll a child. Many of the people who came to the door were friendly in return.

At the first daycare, a woman invited us inside for a tour. There were activity tables with child-sized chairs, nap mats neatly stacked, art on the walls, age-appropriate books arranged on a shelf.

While everything looked legitimate, the woman would not give us an application, and I noted that only one child was present at the time.

As we ventured to other locations, we encountered some obvious red flags. Windows fully covered, no signage, and very few outdoor play areas. Most of the people who answered the door told us the owner was not there. They asked us to come back another time. Most significantly, we rarely saw or heard any kids.

At the last spot a woman spoke to us through a doorbell camera.

“We don’t have childcare,” she said.

The windows were fully covered.

 

Day 2: Trouble with the police

On our second day visiting Somali-run daycares listed on the state website, we met up with local journalist Carleen Johnson of The Center Square.

At one site, a woman spoke to us from behind a closed door. She wasn’t willing to give us an application. We asked a few more brief questions, thanked her, and started walking away. Shortly after, two women came out of the house to scold us.

Someone had called the police.

A responding officer assured us that we were not trespassing or doing anything wrong. The women allowed him to look inside the home, and he confirmed that there were kids inside.

The hostility was surprising. By then, a local KOMO News reporter was doing similar work – knocking on doors and asking questions. Basic shoe-leather journalism. Not harassment. Not racism.

We continued throughout the city. Some of the places we visited looked like real daycares, but many did not.

We detailed our findings on social media.

 

Day 3: Where has all the money gone?

We began looking deeper into the publicly available spending data on the Washington State Fiscal Information website. This site, also known as Open Checkbook, discloses provider payments by month and fiscal year. Our third day was focused on visits to providers that received significant amounts of funding.

Another independent journalist, Cam Higby, was with us as well.

Many of these small home daycares were receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer funds each year – some got more than a million. Keep in mind that most of these daycares have a maximum capacity of 12 children.

At one address we visited, a man spoke to us from a porch camera. He told us it was not a daycare.

Another alleged daycare was listed at the address of a small, run-down house. The windows were covered. We didn’t see or hear any children. Besides a tattered basketball hoop sitting in a mud puddle at the edge of the property, there was no play equipment. The woman who answered the door was friendly but declined to provide us with any information or an application.

Our team asked two neighbors if they had seen kids at the house and if they were aware it was registered as a daycare.

Both neighbors said no.

Yet, according to state data, the childcare provider listed at that address receives six-figure monthly payments, bringing in over $160,000 in July alone.

As I expanded my research, I checked out the state’s most recent audit. The Washington State Auditor’s Office reviews federal funding annually. Findings are published in a formal report, with highlights summarized on the auditor’s website. The 2024 fiscal year audit exposed significant concerns, including a whopping $416 million dollars in “unauditable” DCYF spending.

The audit revealed that DCYF repeatedly failed to comply with reporting requirements and had more audit “findings” than any other agency.

Despite being given corrective actions to take, similar findings have plagued DCYF for years.

“For the fourth year in a row, we are questioning all childcare payments from the Child Care and Development Fund at the Department of Children, Youth, and Families,” the Auditor’s Office stated.

Read that again. The auditor’s office has questioned ALL federal childcare payments to DCYF for the past four years. Hundreds of millions of dollars in questionable payments.

How is such a blatant failure to follow reporting requirements or enact corrective action even allowed?

I posted a thread summarizing the audit findings on X. Before long, other news outlets and political figures were amplifying what I found.

The strange thing is that the audit findings were never private or hard to uncover. They were right there on a government website for all to see, for years. Why did it take a citizen with an art degree in Washington state to shed light on them?

Knowledge is power, but what comes next?

I want to be clear that I am not alleging fraud at any of these daycares. I do not have the tools or authority to do so. But we, as citizens, do have the tools to spot concerning patterns and question government oversight of our money.

Thanks to social media, we can amplify our concerns so that officials who do have the tools and authority to investigate can be pressured to do so.

State officials have seemingly ignored these red flags for years. Our questions and concerns are fair. We are not racists for recognizing patterns and asking questions.

Our elected officials owe us transparency – and if the media won’t demand it, we should.

About the author: Kristen Magnuson is a Washington state resident and citizen sleuth who helped uncover a troubling pattern with childcare payments in Washington state that mimicked alleged fraud in Minnesota. Follow her work on X at @KristenMag.

 

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals