Brandi Kruse
Politics • Culture • News
Parents are the last people Democrats should be pissing off
There is a growing army of voters who are not only fed up with government interference in their homes, but government ineptitude outside their homes.
April 11, 2023
post photo preview
 

With a single statement, Washington State Senator Marko Liias showed his hand.

There would be no going back. No more hiding it. No amount of words or empty op-eds could reverse the damage done to his fellow Democrats. Party leaders may not realize it yet, but they will.

“I look forward to a future in Washington where every single family supports their trans youth to achieve the care and success that they need,” he said. “Until that day it’s up to us to make sure that there are safe places for them to learn and grow and thrive.”

In other words: He believes the government can parent better than you can.

His words came during a committee hearing on Senate Bill 5599, a proposal that prohibits shelters from notifying parents if their child runs away to seek legally protected healthcare. Under the law, that means your kid’s location, regardless of their age, would be hidden from you if they want to get an abortion, treatment for gender dysphoria, or other medical interventions allowed by state statute.

The bill has already passed in the State Senate and is nearing a vote in the House.

On the surface, Democrats in support of the bill have tried, with varying levels of success, to paint it as an innocent effort to bring LGBTQ+ teens in from the cold. To aid in those efforts, they deployed a reliable tactic: dismissing any valid criticism as fear mongering from the state’s non-existent “right-wing.”

Pushback, they claim, can only be a result of transphobia.

Without this bill, they argue, teens will be forced to live on the streets to seek the care they need. Or, worse yet, trans kids will kill themselves if the protections in SB 5599 don’t become law.

Fear mongering, indeed.

“Our hope is for every child to live in a safe and supportive home that is open to a conversation about necessary medical, behavioral, social and psychological care,” Senator Liias (D-Everett), along with Senator Joe Nguyen (D-White Center), wrote in a Seattle Times op-ed. “But that is not always the case, so it’s crucial that we make sure there are supports available and that kids aren’t left vulnerable on the streets.”

On its own, perhaps we could believe that the intent of SB 5599 is as innocent as they make it seem. But parents across Washington state are becoming wise to a worrisome trend – the government’s creeping intrusion into their homes.

1.jpeg?token-time=1682553600&token-hash=LY_gus0SK_SlNlynVeYrNfilTv-AhWCugC10RB4sTZE%3D

From school closures to political activism in classrooms to handing medical decision-making over to minors, Democrats in Washington state have awakened the most determined force on earth: Moms and dads who want to protect their kids.

When Senate Bill 5599 first came up for a public hearing, more than 4,500 people – mostly parents opposed to the law – signed up to testify.

Here is a sampling of their words:

“A minor … who utters the magic words ‘protected healthcare’ will disappear from the radar of their parents or guardian. There is no safety net for the grieving parent.”
 
“We all want what’s best for children. We all want to give vulnerable children who are confused every opportunity to resolve their mental health issues if that’s what it is and support good care and a safe environment. I think maybe we see differently, though, what constitutes healthy care.”
 
“Parents know and understand a child’s mental health history, comorbidities, and have a right to know about their child’s location.”

Despite the pushback, it seems likely SB 5599 will become law.

The real question is, how far will it go? Or rather, how far will we let it go?

In Oregon, a mom of five hoping to adopt two siblings from foster care was denied after refusing to attest that she would support gender transition care for the children if they wanted it later in life.

Mind you, both foster kids are under the age of 9.

In a federal lawsuit, Jessica Bates said an official with the Oregon Department of Human Services asked whether she would help the children access cross-sex hormones if they wanted them. When she said such treatments are against her religion, the adoption request was denied.

Oregon State Code dictates that adoptive parents must “respect, accept and support the … sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression” of any child they adopt.

The Anti-Defamation League has taken up the case and says such policies rob children of loving homes.

“Oregon’s policy makes a sweeping claim that all persons who hold certain religious beliefs – beliefs held by millions of Americans from diverse religious faiths – are categorically unfit to care for children,” Legal Counsel Johannes Widmalm-Delphonse said in a statement. “That is simply not true. Oregon is putting its political agenda above the needs of countless children who would be happy to grow up in a loving, Christian home like Jessica’s.”

It is not beyond the scope of reality to believe a similar practice could find its way to Washington, where lawmakers are just as (if not more) progressive than those in Oregon. After all, Senate Bill 5599 puts physically abusive parents on the same tier as parents who oppose gender or reproductive care for their children.

If children can be taken from an abusive home, and Democrats consider it abusive not to support a child’s desire to transition, what would stop the government from removing your child from your care if you don’t support their physical gender transformation?

It is a terrifying proposition, but we would be foolish to believe it’s off the table. Remember what Senator Liias said during public testimony for all to hear:

“I look forward to a future in Washington where every single family supports their trans youth to achieve the care and success that they need. Until that day it’s up to us to make sure that there are safe places for them to learn and grow and thrive.”

In other words – raise your kids the way we say you should, or we’ll take over.

While parents in Washington state contend with government overreach inside their homes, they’re also faced with a callous indifference for the safety of their children outside the home.

Amber Goldade, whose 12-year-old daughter Immaculee was hit and killed by a wanted felon in a stolen landscaping truck, has become an outspoken critic of Democratic policies that put the rights of criminals ahead of the safety of families.

Goldade believes her daughter would still be alive had Democrats not passed sweeping restrictions on police pursuits in 2021 – limiting chases in nearly every instance.

“I have suffered horrendously, and I will suffer until my dying day. (Immaculee) is and always will be a victim of the no-pursuit law.”

Sadly, Amber’s daughter isn’t the only child who has been killed as a result of the policy. Near Sunnyside, Washington, two foster kids on their way to a supervised visit were killed when the car they were in was hit head-on by a drunk driver. Multiple law enforcement agencies tried to stop the driver before the collision but could not pursue him because of the law.

Yet, when confronted with heartbreaking stories from parents like Amber Goldade, some progressive Democrats have shown a shocking level of disregard – even disdain – for their plight.

Senator Manka Dhingra (D-Redmond) called opposition to the current pursuit policy an “emotional reaction.”

Rep. Julia Reed (D-Seattle) said those who want the law improved are simply falling for a Republican misinformation campaign.

The conclusion is bleak: Democrats are making it harder for you to protect your kids, both inside and outside the home.

So, what is a parent like Amber to do?

There is only one thing you can do.

Fight.

Fight like parents in Tenino and Enumclaw, who are pushing back against the placement of sexually violent predators in unsecure facilities near homes and school bus stops. 

Fight like parents in Lynnwood, who protested the opening of an opioid treatment facility near a park where their kids play.

Fight like families in Seattle’s Chinatown, who successfully stopped the expansion of a homeless complex in their neighborhood amid rising crime. 

Fight like parents who packed school board meetings to get their kids back in the classroom.

Fight like the thousands of parents who signed up to testify against Senate Bill 5599 – parents who reject the narrative that they are incapable of loving their children if they won’t let them receive life altering gender interventions.

Today in Washington, there is a growing army of voters who are not only fed up with government interference in their homes, but government ineptitude outside their homes.

Democrats would be wise to watch the horizon.

I am not a parent. But over the past year I have seen the power of parents – and I cannot fathom a worse population of people to piss off.

community logo
Join the Brandi Kruse Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
4
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
WATCH: 'Lies hurt people' (6.10.26)

Alliance Defending Freedom sues Washington state over alleged assault of female wrestler by trans opponent. Man attacks signature gatherer, steals voter data. State lawmaker cries during ethics hearing.

Prefer to listen? https://audioboom.com/posts/8915130-lies-hurt-people-6-10-26

01:09:08
WATCH: Teachers’ unions spend big against parents (6.9.26)

Your daily reminder to opt out of the teachers’ union as membership dues used to fight sane voter initiatives. Republicans try to lean into ballot harvesting as Dems surge in late counting. Failed homeless authority will live to see another day. Finally, it’s primary day in Maine.

Prefer to listen? https://audioboom.com/posts/8914575-teachers-unions-spend-big-against-parents-6-9-26

01:08:42
Swamp Watch: Menopause mania (6.9.26)

Does Governor Ferguson focus on things like menopause protections so he doesn't have to deal with bigger issues? Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson dodges softballs. No gas relief in sight.

Subscribe to Zach’s Daily Market Recap at KnowYourRiskPodcast.com.

00:16:21
REMARKS: 'A fundamentally different approach to government'

These remarks were delivered to the Snohomish County Lincoln Day Dinner on May 17, 2024.

REMARKS: 'A fundamentally different approach to government'
'The Final Battle': Remarks to the Whatcom County Republican Party

The following remarks were delivered to the Whatcom County Lincoln Day Dinner on March 23, 2024, in Ferndale, Washington.

I struggled with what to talk to you about tonight. 

Well, that’s not true. I didn't struggle with what to talk to you about – I struggled with whether I was brave enough to say what I wanted to say. 

When I'm invited to speak to groups, I don't want to offend anyone or be too controversial. So, I reached out to a few of your fellow party members to ask whether any topics were off limits or wouldn't go over well with the crowd. 

I got some good advice. 

Then I decided to ignore that good advice entirely.

Too much is at stake to be polite. 

As we sit here tonight, we are in the final battle of a war. 

A war that has pit sanity against insanity. 

Pragmatism against idealism. 

A war that has sacrificed the public good, in favor of a twisted idea of progress.

It's a war that began long before I moved here 15 years ago. It started silently and it was mostly waged in the shadows.

Most of us didn't even realize that a war was being fought. We were too caught up in our own lives and our own problems. ...

'The Final Battle': Remarks to the Whatcom County Republican Party
INTERVIEW: Congressman Dan Newhouse

During a visit to Eastern Washington, Brandi sat down with Congressman Dan Newhouse (R-WA04) to discuss the fentanyl crisis, fuel costs, border security, Chinese land acquisition, and how he was able to survive his vote to impeach Donald Trump.

INTERVIEW: Congressman Dan Newhouse
LIVE: Consent? What consent? (6.11.26)

Prosecutors have declined to file charges against a trans wrestler for sexual assault, citing issues around consent. Male teacher claims to be non-binary, gets to watch girls undress. Governor Ferguson tries to gaslight voters about the economy. Iran is coming to Seattle for the World Cup.

LIVE: ‘Lies hurt people’ (6.10.26)

Alliance Defending Freedom sues Washington state over alleged assault of female wrestler by trans opponent. Man attacks signature gatherer, steals voter data. State lawmaker cries during ethics hearing.

post photo preview
A dispatch from Idaho: Tuesday, June 2
But rumors of people fleeing are overblown, right Mayor Katie Wilson?

Reminder: Regular live shows of unDivided will resume Wednesday, June 3.

Team unDivided has now been in Idaho for four days. As we depart, we've yet to see a homeless person, a tent, a needle, graffiti, a pride flag, anyone with blue hair, or gas over $5 a gallon.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
A dispatch from Idaho: Monday, June 1
Business flight from Washington didn't start with the passage of an income tax on millionaires.

Reminder: Regular live shows of unDivided will resume Wednesday, June 3.

Team unDivided is in Idaho to debunk the claim being made by Washington state Democrats that capital flight is a myth.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
We fight on – because what other choice is there?
They can try to destroy my reputation. It still won't put them on the right side of history.
 

This week, progressive political strategists launched an effort to undermine my support of citizen initiatives – arguing that my opinions are no longer protected by the First Amendment and should therefore be regulated by the state.

You read that correctly.

In a 24-page complaint to the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission, an obscure organization that styles itself as Washingtonians for Ethical Government called for an immediate investigation into my public support of two voter initiatives that will appear on the ballot in November – one to protect girls' sports, the other to restore parental rights.

Kruse is possibly the most prolific of political content creators in Washington, and her promotions of Let’s Go Washington’s initiatives do not qualify as editorial content. Kruse is not an impartial journalist or just an opinionated member of the public; she is a commercial advertiser with multiple advertisers. Although Kruse was once employed as a reporter by bonafide news outlets, she is no longer commonly considered as a journalist in Washington State and was recently denied press credentials by the Washington State Capitol Correspondents Association, a decision that was upheld by both state and federal courts.

Their argument goes something like this:

  • I host a podcast.

  • My podcast sells spots to advertisers.

  • I endorse products for said advertisers.

  • Therefore, my endorsements have value.

  • Therefore, my political endorsements have value.

  • Therefore, any political endorsements I make must be reported to the Public Disclosure Commission as “in-kind” donations.

There are several factual inaccuracies with the complaint, like the assertion that state and federal courts have determined I’m not a journalist. That is false. While a federal judge declined an emergency motion to have my press pass reinstated in the final days of the 2026 legislative session, our case is ongoing and only in the early stages. I am confident we will prevail.

There are also several legal issues with the complaint, not the least of which is a pesky little thing called the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

But don’t be fooled – the goal of the complaint isn’t for it to stick. The goal is to harm my reputation in the court of public opinion.

Still, for the sake of posterity, it’s worth noting a few things:

The government cannot assign a numerical value to my political speech. Such an act would be extraordinary and without precedent in the history of the United States.

I have never received anything of monetary value to support or oppose any political candidate, initiative, or issue. Quite the contrary. I have given untold hours, made personal donations, and driven tens of thousands of miles around the state to lend my voice to issues and people I believe in.

I have the right to charge advertisers for endorsements, or to provide endorsements free of charge if I wish. And I have. In the years following the pandemic, I featured local small businesses on my show free of charge – and gave them attention on social media, urging followers to support businesses that were struggling to recover from government-imposed lockdowns. I also did this in 2020 while still employed as a news reporter at FOX 13 in Seattle, running a weekly segment on my political show called “Small Business Sunday.”

Providing paid endorsements of products is a common practice in broadcasting and has been for decades. Many of our current advertisers were once endorsed on the radio by the late Dori Monson. Several local radio hosts who endorse products on air have also made public statements about their support of current voter initiatives. Ari Hoffman of KVI and John Curley of KIRO Radio not only endorse products but have stood alongside me in support of girls and parents.

If the Public Disclosure Commission were to rule that my speech must be regulated, it would also have to start regulating the speech of dozens of mainstream radio hosts – and perhaps even the Editorial Board of the Seattle Times.

Beyond that, this issue is settled law in Washington.

The Washington State Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that endorsements from talk show hosts do not constitute in-kind contributions.

At the time, radio hosts John Carlson and Kirby Wilbur were organizing and promoting Initiative 912, aimed at stopping an incremental increase in the gas tax.

'The mere fact that a broadcast has value to a campaign, or includes solicitation of funds, votes, or other support, does not convert commentary into advertising when it occurs during the content portion of a broadcast for which payment is not normally required,' Justice Barbara Madsen wrote for the court.

But again, the point of the complaint is not to upend existing law or get the government to throw the First Amendment to the wind.

The progressive political strategists behind the stunt, Powerhouse Strategic, is the firm used by opponents of the Let’s Go Washington initiatives.

Few news outlets that covered Tuesday’s press release saw fit to mention this connection. Why? It’s not as if it’s a secret. Kristin Hyde, a communications specialist with Powerhouse Strategic, sent the release out with her name and contact information on it.

Powerhouse not only brought previous PDC complaints against Let’s Go Washington, but it also represents the Washington State Democratic Party, as well as two of the largest unions bankrolling the anti-initiative campaigns: SEIU and the Washington Education Association.

1.png?token-hash=Rsuomg_82zpfRv9wDl5Yj5pls7-whh7ucO_ZK0G6vE8%3D&token-time=1779926400

Still, The Seattle Times characterized Washingtonians for Ethical Government (WFEG) only as a “campaign finance watchdog.”

Even if it were a legitimate watchdog group and not a cover for deeply partisan operatives, in the past 10 years it’s only ever questioned the “ethics” of conservatives.

1.png?token-hash=kEF0Gl5391E8QNe-c3xP0lSO4rvB-K86pbSiK_lUup0%3D&token-time=1779926400

In case there was any doubt, I fully intend to continue my work fighting for what I truly believe is the women’s rights issue of our generation: the erasure of girls at the hands of ideologues.

After all, I was fighting this issue long before Let’s Go Washington decided to run initiatives to change state law. In fact, it was through episodes of unDivided that LGW met two of the teen athletes – Ahnaleigh Wilson and Frances Staudt – who would go on to become important voices in the campaign to protect female athletes. I like to think our coverage of the issue is a big reason why voters will get a say in November. I am very proud of that.

1.jpg?token-hash=j3Zy8oY8oJaza2PZlQJDQgdNdSeRb2Z5ArWk7-muENI%3D&token-time=1779926400
Me with Frances Staudt (left) and Ahnaleigh Wilson (right) at a signature gathering event in Issaquah, Washington.

I will also keep fighting for parental rights, as I was before LGW started collecting signatures for a parental bill of rights. My advocacy on this issue goes back to 2023, when I helped a rag-tag group of citizens collect signatures to try to run a referendum on Senate Bill 5599. The law allows children to be hidden from parents if they don’t think their family approves of their gender identity. I was protested, threatened, and called a transphobe. All the usual stuff. The referendum fell short, but my motivation to help parents keep their families together only grew.

1.jpg?token-hash=g-4GoyPQwU1zwfq1NCZjpaAVuIv9Pne4dj5jOTCWOPQ%3D&token-time=1779926400
Protesters greet us outside a coffee shop in Lacey, Washington, where we were collecting signatures to repeal SB 5599.

As I said on my show this week: They can try to bankrupt my business. They can try to destroy my reputation. They can even try to kill me. None of it puts them on the right side of history.

So, we fight on. What other choice is there?

 

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals