Brandi Kruse
News • Politics • Culture
10 ways Washington state Democrats undermined democracy to remain in power – and got away with it
Our founding fathers, who understood the importance of press freedom, would be rolling in their graves
November 22, 2024
post photo preview

 

 

When I quit my job at Seattle’s FOX affiliate three years ago, frustrated with new management and disillusioned with the state of the profession, my hope was always that legacy media could find its way back from the brink – and that I might make my way back to it someday.

In the last few months, I’ve come to the realization that old media may be too far gone to save.

Throughout the 2024 election cycle, unDivided covered numerous efforts from the Washington State Democratic Party and its allies to undermine and outright attack the democratic process. Many of these actions were carried out in the light of day, with little to no coverage from mainstream outlets. At the same time, Democrats and their friends in the press worked overtime to convince voters that the party out of power was the real “threat to democracy.”

As I reflect on the results of the election, which further solidified one-party control of state government, I am convinced that our state will remain on its current downward trajectory until local media either sheds its obedience to the party in control – or is rendered obsolete.

What might bring about such a change is unclear. Certainly, Washingtonians who are disappointed with the Fourth Estate should say as much. On social media, in letters to editors, in emails or phone calls to news stations. But ultimately, money is the driver of all decisions in corporate media. Ratings drive advertising buys. Subscriptions drive hiring and firing. Clicks add up to cash.

The solution? Demand changes or consider unplugging from the machine entirely.  

For example, The Seattle Times has no conservative columnists. Not one. While Seattle is certainly a blue city, 22% of King County voters cast their ballots for Donald Trump. 28% for Dave Reichert. Not to mention Seattle has a Republican city attorney. Does that not warrant at least one member of the editorial board who is a supporter of the president-elect, or at the very least a true conservative?  Should the board not have a single member, or the paper a single columnist, who strongly dissents from the prevailing political view? How can the newspaper of record hold the party in power accountable if every single one of them belong to it?

Certainly, The Times is not the only news agency in the state that’s forgotten what its function is supposed to be. As Bob Ferguson spewed falsehood after falsehood in TV ads this cycle, news stations were more than happy to take his campaign cash – and less eager to demand truthfulness.

Our founding fathers, who understood the importance of press freedom, would be rolling in their graves.

Just so we're all on the same page about how bad things got this cycle, here are 10 ways Democrats undermined democracy during the 2024 election – and got away with it.

10: Sanctioned harassment of lawful signature gatherers

As it became clear in late 2023 that Let's Go Washington could indeed qualify six initiatives to the legislature, the Washington State Democratic Party – along with the ACLU and progressive group FUSE Washington – encouraged harassment of lawful signature gatherers. An established tipline asked callers to provide the "location, time of day, and description of the circulator." It even recommended callers take pictures.

In the weeks that followed, signature gatherers were routinely subjected to harassment and even criminal conduct.

The ordeal prompted Republican lawmakers to craft a bill that would have implemented new protections for signature gatherers, which I personally testified in favor of. Unsurprisingly, the bill failed to gain traction with Democrats in the majority and received little attention in the news.

While a few media reports detailed the harassment hotline, journalists lacked the sort of rigorous questioning and follow up reporting that would have helped put an end to it. Instead, stories took a "both sides" approach that gave perpetrators a platform to paint their motives as righteous and necessary.

9: Secret lawsuit to keep initiatives off the ballot

Panic ensued in early August when initiative supporters learned that the State Supreme Court was about to decide on a Democrat-backed lawsuit that would have kept citizen initiatives off November's ballot.

Attorney General Bob Ferguson's office, which was tasked with defending the initiatives and the way in which signatures were validated by the Secretary of State, had inexplicably kept Let's Go Washington – and the public – in the dark about the hearing.

Thankfully, the state's high court rejected the initiative challenge. But legal experts were left stunned by the secrecy.

“In 22 years of legal practice, I’ve never seen a case progress this far without all necessary parties being before the court or at least being given the courtesy of a phone call about litigation as important as this," said Jackon Maynard of the Citizen Action Defense Fund. "Participation in the initiative process is a fundamental right, and the idea that the state Supreme Court with the stroke of a pen could’ve eliminated the voices of the millions who signed the petitions in this case without even hearing from all impacted parties is really troubling.” 

AG Ferguson has never provided – or been pressed by the media to provide – an adequate answer about his lack of transparency. If you expect his opaque ways to improve in the governor’s mansion, don’t hold your breath. He’s become quite accustomed to the press looking the other way.

8: Energy credit bribe

In truth, we could do an entire list just covering the lies Governor Jay Inslee spewed about the Climate Commitment Act – from lying about the impact it would have on gas prices, to lying about the impact of repealing it.

But the most egregious action Governor Inslee took was trying to influence the outcome of the November election by bribing voters … with their own money.

This past legislative session, with a potential repeal of the CCA on the horizon, Democrats in Olympia allotted millions in funds to give energy customers $200 credits. They didn’t even attempt to hide their motives – requiring that the credits be paid out to customers (AKA voters) right before the election. To make things even more obvious, customers receiving the credit were bombarded with emails reminding them that the credits were funded via the Climate Commitment Act.

Governor Inslee shamelessly suggested that proponents of repealing the CCA wanted to take that $200 out of the pocket of Washington’s working poor. Never mind that the CCA is costing the working poor far more than $200 a year in increased prices at the pump and increased energy costs.

Media coverage of what was an obvious bribe meant to influence voters was egregious. One article read like a press release from the State Department of Commerce. It was so bad that MyNorthwest.com was forced to issue an editor's note and add additional information after so many readers (and us) raised hell.

7: Selective transparency

The single biggest factor in the defeat of three citizen initiatives in November was a law passed by Democrats that had one obvious objective: Made it harder for anti-tax measures to be successful.

In 2022, Democrats in Olympia passed HB 1876. It requires that a "public investment impact disclosure appear on the ballot as part of the ballot title for state ballot measures that affect taxes or fees and cause a net change in state revenue."

Most media reports covered the bill as a simple effort to increase transparency on the ballot and provide important context to voters about what would happen if they repeal certain revenue streams.

Sounds innocent enough. But, as we know, political parties don't pass anything without an electoral upside.

With strong Democratic majorities in the House and Senate, and Democratic control of the governor's office, referendums and initiatives are the last remaining tool of those who dissent from the party in power.

So, it's no surprise Democrats would try to weaken it.

While the public investment disclosures may have added context to the ballot, that context was one-sided. For example, the ballot language for I-2117 to repeal the Climate Commitment Act read as follows:

Initiative Measure No. 2117 concerns carbon tax credit trading. This measure would prohibit state agencies from imposing any type of carbon tax credit trading, and repeal legislation establishing a cap and invest program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This measure would decrease funding for investments in transportation, clean air, renewable energy, conservation, and emissions-reduction. Should this measure be enacted into law?

So, voters were told what kind of funding would be lost by repealing the carbon markets, but were never told how much money they would keep in their own pockets. The same is true with the initiative to make the long-term care program optional.

If the goal was truly to increase transparency for voters, then disclosures would include the average cost savings for Washington families. But, of course, the goal wasn't transparency – the goal was always to tip the scales.

6: Harassment of capital gains opposition

Apparently, it wasn't enough to simply harass signature gatherers. Progressive groups that opposed the initiatives wanted to take their fight to people's doorsteps – literally.

Vijay Boyapati, a former Google engineer and tech entrepreneur who led a relatively private life before speaking out in favor of repealing the capital gains tax, found out the hard way what happens when you go against the party in power.

Posters were plastered all over Boyapati's Seattle neighborhood where he lives with his wife and young children.

They read: "Vijay Boyapati is pushing for a tax break for himself that will gut funding for schools. That's just greedy."

Never mind that schools were required by law to be fully funded long before the capital gains tax was passed. 

The message to Boyapati and others who oppose lucrative taxes was clear: Fall in line, or we'll make you feel unsafe.

5. Public schools chief ignores the law  

In March, the legislature passed a voter initiative into law that codifies parental rights. While Democrats certainly had a strategy in mind when passing the measure (likely out of fear it would drive conservative turnout if they let it go to the ballot), I-2081 became law and promised to keep parents informed about what's happening with their kids in school.

Unless it has to do with their gender identity, apparently.

A couple months after I-2081 was passed, Superintendent of Public Instruction Chris Reykdal announced he planned to ignore it.

Despite hundreds of thousands of Washingtonians signing the initiative, and a bipartisan vote to pass it, Reykdal decided that he alone would be the arbitrator of its constitutionality.

Specifically, Reykdal claimed that letting parents know their child may be experiencing gender dysphoria would be a violation of the Federal Education Rights and Privacy Act.

“In Washington state, we recognize that LGBTQ+ youth often face barriers and challenges at higher rates than their peers, and we have worked hard to create learning environments where all students feel welcomed and included,” Reykdal said. “However, we are seeing a disturbing trend of some policymakers implementing state and local policies that aim to undo these protections.”

We also see a disturbing trend of elected officials undermining the will of voters and, in Reykdal's case, getting key endorsements from the media anyway. 

4: Attempts to keep Trump and RFK Jr. off the ballot

Even in a deep blue state like Washington, Democrats don't take anything for granted.

Not only did they seek to keep Donald Trump off the ballot here (twice), but the state party also pushed to keep Robert F. Kennedy Jr. off the ballot. And that was even before he threw his support behind Donald Trump. 

Apparently, the only acceptable opponent for the Washington State Democratic Party is no opponent.

Yay, democracy!

3: 30-day voter registration

Just prior to the primary election, Washington state abolished its requirement that voters establish residency here for 30 days before becoming eligible to cast a ballot.

The story got little traction outside of conservative media.

The change, which voids language in our state constitution that's been in place since 1889, was implemented by Secretary of State Steve Hobbs and Attorney General Bob Ferguson to settle a lawsuit challenging the validity of the 30-day provision.

Hobbs' office said the agreement "saved the state a costly and likely losing court fight."

Kittitas County Auditor Bryan Elliot was among those who expressed concern about the sudden change in the midst of a critical election year.

"Our offices are agile," he said, "but this action has the potential to create further mistrust of the voter registration system, especially when state law and the state constitution both still contain language that is contrary to the consent decree."

2: Inslee pledges to sue “miscreants”

Despite millions of dollars spent to defeat it, Washington voters passed I-2066, which protects natural gas for homes and businesses.

Rather than accept the will of voters, Governor Jay Inslee promptly promised that there would be a lawsuit to challenge the initiative's constitutionality.

“I think there is a very good chance that a court will find that it was defective by violating the single subject rule and therefore will not actually go into effect,” he said.

And just to make sure voters who dared to challenge his climate agenda know exactly how he feels about them, Inslee flew across the planet to tell a United Nations climate forum that half his constituents are "climate deniers" and "miscreants."

1: Bob Ferguson directs SOS to break the law

The most corrupt act of the 2024 election cycle came from our governor-elect, Bob Ferguson. It was also the act that made clear there was little Ferguson could do to elicit criticism from the press.

When citizen sleuth Glen Morgan recruited two other Bob Fergusons to run for governor, threatening to dilute AG Ferguson's share of the vote, the "real" Fergie showed his true colors.

In a press conference, and in a subsequent phone call and letter, Ferguson directed Secretary of State Steve Hobbs to break election law by changing the order on the primary ballot. He wanted his name to appear above the other Bobs.

Had a Republican candidate for governor done the same, no doubt the media would still be talking about it. But when the perpetrator is Ferguson? The story disappeared in a matter of days.

If you can publicly call on fellow elected officials to break the law to benefit your political campaign and still win by double digits, what motivation is there to act with integrity?

The answer: None. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the problem. 

 

 

community logo
Join the Brandi Kruse Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
4
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
WATCH: Murder is a predictable outcome (12.19.24)

When government policies cater to the law-breaking, loss of life is to be expected. Evictions are skyrocketing and the media blames everything except the actual cause. Activist judge strikes again. Idaho Board of Education stands up for meritocracy. Cato Institute ranks the freest states.

01:07:12
WATCH: The desires of a double murderer (12.18.24)

The Seattle Times writes sob story about killer who says trans inmates are being treated unfairly. Olympia looks to become a ‘sanctuary’ for the gender diverse. State appointees want more power over sheriffs. The Left picks and chooses which gun crimes to be mad about. Common sense out of Canada.

Prefer to listen: https://audioboom.com/posts/8626156-the-desires-of-a-double-murderer-12-18-24

01:06:09
WATCH: A baffling level of incompetence (12.17.24)

To solve budget deficit, Governor Inslee proposes raising taxes and spending. There’s only one entity to blame for Washington’s incompetent leadership. A so-called solution to protecting kids from drug abusing parents will leave you speechless. Trump sues pollster. Blue-state leaders think we’re all stupid.

Prefer to listen? https://audioboom.com/posts/8625545-a-baffling-level-of-incompetence-12-17-24

01:22:17
REMARKS: 'A fundamentally different approach to government'

These remarks were delivered to the Snohomish County Lincoln Day Dinner on May 17, 2024.

REMARKS: 'A fundamentally different approach to government'
'The Final Battle': Remarks to the Whatcom County Republican Party

The following remarks were delivered to the Whatcom County Lincoln Day Dinner on March 23, 2024, in Ferndale, Washington.

I struggled with what to talk to you about tonight. 

Well, that’s not true. I didn't struggle with what to talk to you about – I struggled with whether I was brave enough to say what I wanted to say. 

When I'm invited to speak to groups, I don't want to offend anyone or be too controversial. So, I reached out to a few of your fellow party members to ask whether any topics were off limits or wouldn't go over well with the crowd. 

I got some good advice. 

Then I decided to ignore that good advice entirely.

Too much is at stake to be polite. 

As we sit here tonight, we are in the final battle of a war. 

A war that has pit sanity against insanity. 

Pragmatism against idealism. 

A war that has sacrificed the public good, in favor of a twisted idea of progress.

It's a war that began long before I moved here 15 years ago. It started silently and it was mostly waged in the shadows.

Most of us didn't even realize that a war was being fought. We were too caught up in our own lives and our own problems. ...

'The Final Battle': Remarks to the Whatcom County Republican Party
INTERVIEW: Congressman Dan Newhouse

During a visit to Eastern Washington, Brandi sat down with Congressman Dan Newhouse (R-WA04) to discuss the fentanyl crisis, fuel costs, border security, Chinese land acquisition, and how he was able to survive his vote to impeach Donald Trump.

INTERVIEW: Congressman Dan Newhouse
December 20, 2024

https://reason.com/2024/12/20/covid-19-lockdowns-unleashed-a-wave-of-murder/

“But Jay Inslee kept us safe!” That ridiculous statement regarding Inslee’s response to Covid hysteria in the comments of a Seattle Times article was the final straw for me. This was an inevitability of his garbage policy. I canceled my subscription and haven’t looked back. I do miss the sports section though.

LIVE: Murder is a predictable outcome (12.19.24)

When government policies cater to the law-breaking, loss of life is to be expected. Evictions are skyrocketing and the media blames everything except the actual cause. Activist judge strikes again. Idaho Board of Education stands up for meritocracy. Cato Institute ranks the freest states.

LIVE: The desires of a double-murderer (12.18.24)

The Seattle Times writes sob story about killer who says trans inmates are being treated unfairly. Olympia looks to become a ‘sanctuary’ for the gender diverse. State appointees want more power over sheriffs. The Left picks and chooses which gun crimes to be mad about. Common sense out of Canada.

unDivided's Holiday Schedule
Don't worry, unDivided won't ditch you during the holidays!

Enjoy our special series "Truth Tellers," starting December 24 with Ana Kasparian, host and producer of The Young Turks. Subscribers can also join me for a LIVE Q&A December 29th at 8pm PT.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Early Christmas gift: Democrats' leaked tax plans
It's worse than getting a lump of coal in your stocking.
 

It's the equivalent of finding the Christmas gifts your parents tried hiding under their bed. Washington State Senate Democrats have inadvertently leaked their plans for new taxes in 2025 – and unDivided snuck a peek.

Friday afternoon, Democratic State Senator Noel Frame (Yes, Noel – could you get a better name for an X-mas political story?) appears to have accidently sent an email intended for her caucus to Republicans as well. In the email, provided to unDivided by several of its unintended recipients, Frame summarizes what was discussed at a Democratic "retreat."

The email and its attachments are worse than getting a lump of coal in your stocking. Democrats plan to introduce a string of new tax policies that will target the wealthy, businesses big and small, and allow localities to increase your property taxes at a higher rate.

'Identify the villain'

1.jpg?token-time=1736035200&token-hash=_EnurU-mx-ZP9w_VHS-5gjGyve_9TzF6FHYbCDOv7WE%3D

The word "villain" is used a lot throughout the proposals, as Democrats work to coordinate their messaging on tax increases. The slides contain do's and don'ts of selling the policies to the public.

"Be specific about the villain. Talk about the wealthy few and those who wrote our flawed (sic) tax code 100 years ago."

Don't "focus on the budget hole." Instead, "focus on the solutions and how it will make people's lives better."

Don't say "tax the rich" or "pay their fair share." Instead, say "pay what they owe."

1.jpg?token-time=1736035200&token-hash=MigYFmAz0SrD44-jAZvZnl3JgXjJkyBotjce70W5l0k%3D

Democrats plan to use the same strategy that was successful in defeating I-2109, which sought to repeal the capital gains tax, in order to sway public opinion in favor of taxing the wealthy and businesses.

1.jpg?token-time=1736035200&token-hash=dz9c9FCYNPclbn2pfY9aOabdQUlb3hl3VuSfdFOJIf4%3D

Expanding Seattle's bad tax policy statewide

In the summer of 2020, the Seattle City Council pushed through a tax on high paying jobs (known as the Jump Start Tax) that led the city's largest employer, Amazon, to move 10,000+ jobs to Bellevue.

Now, Democrats want to expand that tax statewide. In the documents, they offer two possible versions. One would replicate the Seattle tax more closely, limiting the tax to only companies with $8M+ in payroll. The second version would be more wide-reaching, removing "the requirement that the company have $8 million minimum payroll, so it applies to all businesses not just big businesses."

1.png?token-time=1736035200&token-hash=lH1FmQhqy1VPbPY_q69ZVE9qFmgpVQcVRP5Qs3WVuTY%3D

Wealth tax

We already knew a tax on unrealized gains was coming, because even Governor Jay Inslee proposed it in his budget – signaling mainstream Democratic support for what used to be a fringe desire of Leftists on the Naughty List.

1.png?token-time=1736035200&token-hash=uZ2bpWgFLx0T0NdjIowVrliokDVvM-wzEAzgoV5ZHkc%3DAdd that to the other anti-business taxes, and Washington's largest employers are no doubt looking to migrate south for the winter – or forever.

1.png?token-time=1736035200&token-hash=p2ux9CqS_jbXwcDDPfOWylYhRxq59QFXgEBiYFGKPMY%3DHow the Grinch stole common sense

Not a rich person or business owner? Cheer up, there's still something for you under the tree.

How about an added 11% tax when you buy guns or ammo?

Expansion of the Real Estate Excise Tax?

Or, worst of all, lifting the property tax lid so cities and counties can raise your property taxes at a faster rate.

1.jpg?token-time=1736035200&token-hash=OyhNMu6fH_6y_Oozf7HJspuhms7z3LxtGymML6tCivE%3D

Ignorance is holiday bliss

All of this so Democrats don't have to wrestle with the reality that they have misspent taxpayer funds and failed to budget during times of exceptional revenue growth. While our state's budget has doubled over the past 12 years, Democrats have no plan to take a serious look at spending.

Their excuse for out-of-control spending and a looming budget deficit of $14B?

Inflation.

Bah humbug.

1.png?token-time=1736035200&token-hash=o8-XaNB8ZhDfSloZN6scVPDf44gi46iDJywLZlDcwF4%3D

 

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
7 must-win seats to stop a dangerous Democratic supermajority
You know those pesky citizen initiatives that have been a thorn in the side of the party in power? Consider them the first thing on the chopping block.
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals