Brandi Kruse
Politics • Culture • News
Guest editorial: How Washington’s mental health laws strip parents of their rights
Couture: "Washington State Sen. Jamie Pedersen claimed that parents have had no right to consent or even be notified about their child’s mental health services since 1985. This claim is deliberately misleading."
February 10, 2025
post photo preview

Late last week, Washington State Senate Majority Leader Jamie Pederson (D-Seattle) made bone-chilling claims during a now viral FOX News interview.

“Kids over 13 have the complete right to make their own decisions about their mental health care. Parents don’t have a right to have notice. They don’t have a right to have consent about that,” he said.

The comments came amid Democratic efforts, led by Sen. Pedersen, to roll back Washington’s parental bill of rights, which was passed into law in 2024 after a successful voter initiative.  

Republican State Representative Travis Couture, an opponent of Democratic efforts to undo I-2081, took to X to explain how Pedersen is mischaracterizing state law to gaslight voters and escape widespread blowback.

His comments are reposted here with permission and edited for length.

1.jpg?token-time=1740441600&token-hash=X6Nz4roM7vm3_M8-w6BDfoaPse1A96dvifqojBJZJt0%3D

 

Guest editorial | Rep. Travis Couture (R-Allyn)

Washington State Senator Jamie Pedersen claimed that parents have had no right to consent or even be notified about their child’s mental health services since 1985. He suggested that the uproar over parental rights today is misplaced – that nothing has changed in forty years.

This claim is deliberately misleading.

While it is true that state law has allowed minors 13 and older to access mental health counseling without parental consent since 1985 (RCW 71.34.530), the definition of “mental health care” has changed radically. What once meant talk therapy and substance abuse counseling has now expanded to include gender-affirming medical treatments, psychiatric medications, and reproductive services – all without parental involvement. This is not a minor technicality. It is a fundamental shift in how Washington treats parental rights, and it is exactly why parents are fighting back.

In 1985, when Washington first allowed minors to access mental health care independently, the law was narrowly focused on traditional mental health services. A 13-year-old struggling with depression or anxiety could seek therapy without needing parental approval. This was based on the belief that some children might be in unsafe home situations where parental consent was a barrier to necessary care. However, the system still recognized parents’ role in their child’s life, and there were appropriate limits built into law. For example, parents could still access medical records unless a provider determined it would harm the child. The law was intended to ensure access to counseling, not irreversible medical interventions.

Fast forward to 2021, and Washington Democrats radically expanded what qualifies as mental health care. Under SB 5313 and other recent laws (SB 5599), minors 13 and older can now obtain gender-affirming treatments, including puberty blockers and hormone therapy, without parental knowledge or consent. The state also barred insurance companies from informing parents when their child receives these treatments, psychiatric medications, or reproductive health services. This is not the same law from 1985 – this is an intentional effort to erase parental involvement in some of the most consequential medical decisions a child can make.

SB 5313 ensures that gender-affirming treatments are classified as medically necessary care, preventing insurers from denying coverage for these procedures. While the bill itself does not explicitly grant minors the right to consent to these treatments, Washington law, as previously noted, already allows minors 13 and older to make their own mental health care decisions. By redefining gender-affirming care as a form of mental health treatment, SB 5313 reinforces the idea that these interventions can be accessed under existing minor consent laws – effectively cutting parents out of the process.

SB 5599 takes this a step further by allowing licensed shelters and host homes to conceal the location of runaway minors from their parents if the child is seeking gender-affirming care or reproductive services. Before, shelters would notify parents within 24-72 hours of taking in a runaway, but under this law they are exempt from that requirement if the child claims they are fleeing for gender-affirming or reproductive care. This means that not only can a minor consent to medical interventions without parental involvement, but the state is now actively facilitating the separation of children from their parents in cases where the parents might disagree with or even be unaware of their child’s medical decisions.

When combined, SB 5313 and SB 5599 create a dangerous framework: minors can seek gender-related medical interventions under the broad umbrella of mental health care, and if their parents oppose or even question these treatments, the state can step in to protect the child from parental interference.

By pretending nothing has changed in four decades, Democrats are gaslighting parents who have had their rights systematically stripped away. The senator’s argument ignores the magnitude of these policy shifts. Parents were once simply excluded from routine therapy sessions; now they are locked out of decisions that can permanently alter their child’s body and mind. A 13-year-old in Washington cannot get a tattoo, smoke a cigarette, or take an aspirin at school without parental consent – but that same child can begin a regimen of puberty blockers or hormones without their parents ever knowing.

This radical redefinition of mental health care does not protect children – it exposes them to harm. Parents are their child’s most important advocates, the ones who know them best, and the ones responsible for their well-being. Stripping them of their role in medical decision-making is not progressive – it is reckless. The idea that these changes are just a continuation of a forty-year-old policy is a blatant lie meant to silence criticism and obscure the real issue. Washington’s laws have not stayed the same – they have transformed, and in doing so, they have pushed parents out of the picture entirely.

Parents are not upset because they suddenly decided to care about a law passed in 1985. They are upset because the government has moved the goalposts, expanding the definition of mental health care in ways that go far beyond what was ever intended. The fight for parental rights in Washington is not about rolling back access to therapy – it is about stopping the state from making life-altering medical decisions for children behind their parents’ backs. Washington Democrats can try to rewrite history, but parents know the truth.

Renewed efforts by Democrats in Olympia to erase voter-backed parental rights couldn’t come at a more perplexing time. Despite spending more money on public education per pupil than ever before, recent National Report Card scores show Washington state with the worst academic outcomes in math and reading in three decades. Despite spending untold millions to bolster mental health in schools, Healthy Youth Survey results show kids in public schools feel more hopeless and less safe.

Parents are a child's first teacher and are the primary stakeholders in the upbringing and safety of their kids. Washington parents do not co-parent with the government, and the state does not own our kids. It is time Democrats in Olympia cease promoting policies that keep secrets from parents about their kids – and stop passing radical laws that irreversibly harm children while keeping parents in the dark.

 

 

community logo
Join the Brandi Kruse Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
2
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
WATCH: 'Lies hurt people' (6.10.26)

Alliance Defending Freedom sues Washington state over alleged assault of female wrestler by trans opponent. Man attacks signature gatherer, steals voter data. State lawmaker cries during ethics hearing.

Prefer to listen? https://audioboom.com/posts/8915130-lies-hurt-people-6-10-26

01:09:08
WATCH: Teachers’ unions spend big against parents (6.9.26)

Your daily reminder to opt out of the teachers’ union as membership dues used to fight sane voter initiatives. Republicans try to lean into ballot harvesting as Dems surge in late counting. Failed homeless authority will live to see another day. Finally, it’s primary day in Maine.

Prefer to listen? https://audioboom.com/posts/8914575-teachers-unions-spend-big-against-parents-6-9-26

01:08:42
Swamp Watch: Menopause mania (6.9.26)

Does Governor Ferguson focus on things like menopause protections so he doesn't have to deal with bigger issues? Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson dodges softballs. No gas relief in sight.

Subscribe to Zach’s Daily Market Recap at KnowYourRiskPodcast.com.

00:16:21
REMARKS: 'A fundamentally different approach to government'

These remarks were delivered to the Snohomish County Lincoln Day Dinner on May 17, 2024.

REMARKS: 'A fundamentally different approach to government'
'The Final Battle': Remarks to the Whatcom County Republican Party

The following remarks were delivered to the Whatcom County Lincoln Day Dinner on March 23, 2024, in Ferndale, Washington.

I struggled with what to talk to you about tonight. 

Well, that’s not true. I didn't struggle with what to talk to you about – I struggled with whether I was brave enough to say what I wanted to say. 

When I'm invited to speak to groups, I don't want to offend anyone or be too controversial. So, I reached out to a few of your fellow party members to ask whether any topics were off limits or wouldn't go over well with the crowd. 

I got some good advice. 

Then I decided to ignore that good advice entirely.

Too much is at stake to be polite. 

As we sit here tonight, we are in the final battle of a war. 

A war that has pit sanity against insanity. 

Pragmatism against idealism. 

A war that has sacrificed the public good, in favor of a twisted idea of progress.

It's a war that began long before I moved here 15 years ago. It started silently and it was mostly waged in the shadows.

Most of us didn't even realize that a war was being fought. We were too caught up in our own lives and our own problems. ...

'The Final Battle': Remarks to the Whatcom County Republican Party
INTERVIEW: Congressman Dan Newhouse

During a visit to Eastern Washington, Brandi sat down with Congressman Dan Newhouse (R-WA04) to discuss the fentanyl crisis, fuel costs, border security, Chinese land acquisition, and how he was able to survive his vote to impeach Donald Trump.

INTERVIEW: Congressman Dan Newhouse
LIVE: Consent? What consent? (6.11.26)

Prosecutors have declined to file charges against a trans wrestler for sexual assault, citing issues around consent. Male teacher claims to be non-binary, gets to watch girls undress. Governor Ferguson tries to gaslight voters about the economy. Iran is coming to Seattle for the World Cup.

LIVE: ‘Lies hurt people’ (6.10.26)

Alliance Defending Freedom sues Washington state over alleged assault of female wrestler by trans opponent. Man attacks signature gatherer, steals voter data. State lawmaker cries during ethics hearing.

post photo preview
A dispatch from Idaho: Tuesday, June 2
But rumors of people fleeing are overblown, right Mayor Katie Wilson?

Reminder: Regular live shows of unDivided will resume Wednesday, June 3.

Team unDivided has now been in Idaho for four days. As we depart, we've yet to see a homeless person, a tent, a needle, graffiti, a pride flag, anyone with blue hair, or gas over $5 a gallon.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
A dispatch from Idaho: Monday, June 1
Business flight from Washington didn't start with the passage of an income tax on millionaires.

Reminder: Regular live shows of unDivided will resume Wednesday, June 3.

Team unDivided is in Idaho to debunk the claim being made by Washington state Democrats that capital flight is a myth.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
We fight on – because what other choice is there?
They can try to destroy my reputation. It still won't put them on the right side of history.
 

This week, progressive political strategists launched an effort to undermine my support of citizen initiatives – arguing that my opinions are no longer protected by the First Amendment and should therefore be regulated by the state.

You read that correctly.

In a 24-page complaint to the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission, an obscure organization that styles itself as Washingtonians for Ethical Government called for an immediate investigation into my public support of two voter initiatives that will appear on the ballot in November – one to protect girls' sports, the other to restore parental rights.

Kruse is possibly the most prolific of political content creators in Washington, and her promotions of Let’s Go Washington’s initiatives do not qualify as editorial content. Kruse is not an impartial journalist or just an opinionated member of the public; she is a commercial advertiser with multiple advertisers. Although Kruse was once employed as a reporter by bonafide news outlets, she is no longer commonly considered as a journalist in Washington State and was recently denied press credentials by the Washington State Capitol Correspondents Association, a decision that was upheld by both state and federal courts.

Their argument goes something like this:

  • I host a podcast.

  • My podcast sells spots to advertisers.

  • I endorse products for said advertisers.

  • Therefore, my endorsements have value.

  • Therefore, my political endorsements have value.

  • Therefore, any political endorsements I make must be reported to the Public Disclosure Commission as “in-kind” donations.

There are several factual inaccuracies with the complaint, like the assertion that state and federal courts have determined I’m not a journalist. That is false. While a federal judge declined an emergency motion to have my press pass reinstated in the final days of the 2026 legislative session, our case is ongoing and only in the early stages. I am confident we will prevail.

There are also several legal issues with the complaint, not the least of which is a pesky little thing called the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

But don’t be fooled – the goal of the complaint isn’t for it to stick. The goal is to harm my reputation in the court of public opinion.

Still, for the sake of posterity, it’s worth noting a few things:

The government cannot assign a numerical value to my political speech. Such an act would be extraordinary and without precedent in the history of the United States.

I have never received anything of monetary value to support or oppose any political candidate, initiative, or issue. Quite the contrary. I have given untold hours, made personal donations, and driven tens of thousands of miles around the state to lend my voice to issues and people I believe in.

I have the right to charge advertisers for endorsements, or to provide endorsements free of charge if I wish. And I have. In the years following the pandemic, I featured local small businesses on my show free of charge – and gave them attention on social media, urging followers to support businesses that were struggling to recover from government-imposed lockdowns. I also did this in 2020 while still employed as a news reporter at FOX 13 in Seattle, running a weekly segment on my political show called “Small Business Sunday.”

Providing paid endorsements of products is a common practice in broadcasting and has been for decades. Many of our current advertisers were once endorsed on the radio by the late Dori Monson. Several local radio hosts who endorse products on air have also made public statements about their support of current voter initiatives. Ari Hoffman of KVI and John Curley of KIRO Radio not only endorse products but have stood alongside me in support of girls and parents.

If the Public Disclosure Commission were to rule that my speech must be regulated, it would also have to start regulating the speech of dozens of mainstream radio hosts – and perhaps even the Editorial Board of the Seattle Times.

Beyond that, this issue is settled law in Washington.

The Washington State Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that endorsements from talk show hosts do not constitute in-kind contributions.

At the time, radio hosts John Carlson and Kirby Wilbur were organizing and promoting Initiative 912, aimed at stopping an incremental increase in the gas tax.

'The mere fact that a broadcast has value to a campaign, or includes solicitation of funds, votes, or other support, does not convert commentary into advertising when it occurs during the content portion of a broadcast for which payment is not normally required,' Justice Barbara Madsen wrote for the court.

But again, the point of the complaint is not to upend existing law or get the government to throw the First Amendment to the wind.

The progressive political strategists behind the stunt, Powerhouse Strategic, is the firm used by opponents of the Let’s Go Washington initiatives.

Few news outlets that covered Tuesday’s press release saw fit to mention this connection. Why? It’s not as if it’s a secret. Kristin Hyde, a communications specialist with Powerhouse Strategic, sent the release out with her name and contact information on it.

Powerhouse not only brought previous PDC complaints against Let’s Go Washington, but it also represents the Washington State Democratic Party, as well as two of the largest unions bankrolling the anti-initiative campaigns: SEIU and the Washington Education Association.

1.png?token-hash=Rsuomg_82zpfRv9wDl5Yj5pls7-whh7ucO_ZK0G6vE8%3D&token-time=1779926400

Still, The Seattle Times characterized Washingtonians for Ethical Government (WFEG) only as a “campaign finance watchdog.”

Even if it were a legitimate watchdog group and not a cover for deeply partisan operatives, in the past 10 years it’s only ever questioned the “ethics” of conservatives.

1.png?token-hash=kEF0Gl5391E8QNe-c3xP0lSO4rvB-K86pbSiK_lUup0%3D&token-time=1779926400

In case there was any doubt, I fully intend to continue my work fighting for what I truly believe is the women’s rights issue of our generation: the erasure of girls at the hands of ideologues.

After all, I was fighting this issue long before Let’s Go Washington decided to run initiatives to change state law. In fact, it was through episodes of unDivided that LGW met two of the teen athletes – Ahnaleigh Wilson and Frances Staudt – who would go on to become important voices in the campaign to protect female athletes. I like to think our coverage of the issue is a big reason why voters will get a say in November. I am very proud of that.

1.jpg?token-hash=j3Zy8oY8oJaza2PZlQJDQgdNdSeRb2Z5ArWk7-muENI%3D&token-time=1779926400
Me with Frances Staudt (left) and Ahnaleigh Wilson (right) at a signature gathering event in Issaquah, Washington.

I will also keep fighting for parental rights, as I was before LGW started collecting signatures for a parental bill of rights. My advocacy on this issue goes back to 2023, when I helped a rag-tag group of citizens collect signatures to try to run a referendum on Senate Bill 5599. The law allows children to be hidden from parents if they don’t think their family approves of their gender identity. I was protested, threatened, and called a transphobe. All the usual stuff. The referendum fell short, but my motivation to help parents keep their families together only grew.

1.jpg?token-hash=g-4GoyPQwU1zwfq1NCZjpaAVuIv9Pne4dj5jOTCWOPQ%3D&token-time=1779926400
Protesters greet us outside a coffee shop in Lacey, Washington, where we were collecting signatures to repeal SB 5599.

As I said on my show this week: They can try to bankrupt my business. They can try to destroy my reputation. They can even try to kill me. None of it puts them on the right side of history.

So, we fight on. What other choice is there?

 

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals