Brandi Kruse
Politics • Culture • News
Guest editorial: How Washington’s mental health laws strip parents of their rights
Couture: "Washington State Sen. Jamie Pedersen claimed that parents have had no right to consent or even be notified about their child’s mental health services since 1985. This claim is deliberately misleading."
February 10, 2025
post photo preview

Late last week, Washington State Senate Majority Leader Jamie Pederson (D-Seattle) made bone-chilling claims during a now viral FOX News interview.

“Kids over 13 have the complete right to make their own decisions about their mental health care. Parents don’t have a right to have notice. They don’t have a right to have consent about that,” he said.

The comments came amid Democratic efforts, led by Sen. Pedersen, to roll back Washington’s parental bill of rights, which was passed into law in 2024 after a successful voter initiative.  

Republican State Representative Travis Couture, an opponent of Democratic efforts to undo I-2081, took to X to explain how Pedersen is mischaracterizing state law to gaslight voters and escape widespread blowback.

His comments are reposted here with permission and edited for length.

1.jpg?token-time=1740441600&token-hash=X6Nz4roM7vm3_M8-w6BDfoaPse1A96dvifqojBJZJt0%3D

 

Guest editorial | Rep. Travis Couture (R-Allyn)

Washington State Senator Jamie Pedersen claimed that parents have had no right to consent or even be notified about their child’s mental health services since 1985. He suggested that the uproar over parental rights today is misplaced – that nothing has changed in forty years.

This claim is deliberately misleading.

While it is true that state law has allowed minors 13 and older to access mental health counseling without parental consent since 1985 (RCW 71.34.530), the definition of “mental health care” has changed radically. What once meant talk therapy and substance abuse counseling has now expanded to include gender-affirming medical treatments, psychiatric medications, and reproductive services – all without parental involvement. This is not a minor technicality. It is a fundamental shift in how Washington treats parental rights, and it is exactly why parents are fighting back.

In 1985, when Washington first allowed minors to access mental health care independently, the law was narrowly focused on traditional mental health services. A 13-year-old struggling with depression or anxiety could seek therapy without needing parental approval. This was based on the belief that some children might be in unsafe home situations where parental consent was a barrier to necessary care. However, the system still recognized parents’ role in their child’s life, and there were appropriate limits built into law. For example, parents could still access medical records unless a provider determined it would harm the child. The law was intended to ensure access to counseling, not irreversible medical interventions.

Fast forward to 2021, and Washington Democrats radically expanded what qualifies as mental health care. Under SB 5313 and other recent laws (SB 5599), minors 13 and older can now obtain gender-affirming treatments, including puberty blockers and hormone therapy, without parental knowledge or consent. The state also barred insurance companies from informing parents when their child receives these treatments, psychiatric medications, or reproductive health services. This is not the same law from 1985 – this is an intentional effort to erase parental involvement in some of the most consequential medical decisions a child can make.

SB 5313 ensures that gender-affirming treatments are classified as medically necessary care, preventing insurers from denying coverage for these procedures. While the bill itself does not explicitly grant minors the right to consent to these treatments, Washington law, as previously noted, already allows minors 13 and older to make their own mental health care decisions. By redefining gender-affirming care as a form of mental health treatment, SB 5313 reinforces the idea that these interventions can be accessed under existing minor consent laws – effectively cutting parents out of the process.

SB 5599 takes this a step further by allowing licensed shelters and host homes to conceal the location of runaway minors from their parents if the child is seeking gender-affirming care or reproductive services. Before, shelters would notify parents within 24-72 hours of taking in a runaway, but under this law they are exempt from that requirement if the child claims they are fleeing for gender-affirming or reproductive care. This means that not only can a minor consent to medical interventions without parental involvement, but the state is now actively facilitating the separation of children from their parents in cases where the parents might disagree with or even be unaware of their child’s medical decisions.

When combined, SB 5313 and SB 5599 create a dangerous framework: minors can seek gender-related medical interventions under the broad umbrella of mental health care, and if their parents oppose or even question these treatments, the state can step in to protect the child from parental interference.

By pretending nothing has changed in four decades, Democrats are gaslighting parents who have had their rights systematically stripped away. The senator’s argument ignores the magnitude of these policy shifts. Parents were once simply excluded from routine therapy sessions; now they are locked out of decisions that can permanently alter their child’s body and mind. A 13-year-old in Washington cannot get a tattoo, smoke a cigarette, or take an aspirin at school without parental consent – but that same child can begin a regimen of puberty blockers or hormones without their parents ever knowing.

This radical redefinition of mental health care does not protect children – it exposes them to harm. Parents are their child’s most important advocates, the ones who know them best, and the ones responsible for their well-being. Stripping them of their role in medical decision-making is not progressive – it is reckless. The idea that these changes are just a continuation of a forty-year-old policy is a blatant lie meant to silence criticism and obscure the real issue. Washington’s laws have not stayed the same – they have transformed, and in doing so, they have pushed parents out of the picture entirely.

Parents are not upset because they suddenly decided to care about a law passed in 1985. They are upset because the government has moved the goalposts, expanding the definition of mental health care in ways that go far beyond what was ever intended. The fight for parental rights in Washington is not about rolling back access to therapy – it is about stopping the state from making life-altering medical decisions for children behind their parents’ backs. Washington Democrats can try to rewrite history, but parents know the truth.

Renewed efforts by Democrats in Olympia to erase voter-backed parental rights couldn’t come at a more perplexing time. Despite spending more money on public education per pupil than ever before, recent National Report Card scores show Washington state with the worst academic outcomes in math and reading in three decades. Despite spending untold millions to bolster mental health in schools, Healthy Youth Survey results show kids in public schools feel more hopeless and less safe.

Parents are a child's first teacher and are the primary stakeholders in the upbringing and safety of their kids. Washington parents do not co-parent with the government, and the state does not own our kids. It is time Democrats in Olympia cease promoting policies that keep secrets from parents about their kids – and stop passing radical laws that irreversibly harm children while keeping parents in the dark.

 

 

community logo
Join the Brandi Kruse Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
2
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
WATCH: Arrested for keeping secrets (5.21.26)

A local public school superintendent faces a felony charge for allegedly trying to cover up allegations of student assaults. Congress does what Washington state won't do on parental rights. Democrats seem incapable of diagnosing why the party lost to Trump. 

Prefer to listen? https://audioboom.com/posts/8906603-arrested-for-keeping-secrets-5-21-26

01:12:16
WATCH: Not forgotten after all (5.20.26)

Trump’s Department of Justice is targeting several radical policies in Washington state. State lawmaker faces public hearing in ethics probe. Activists demand Seattle mayor declare ‘emergency’ for trans refugees. Gavin Newsom is getting really, really scary.

Prefer to listen? https://audioboom.com/posts/8906058-not-forgotten-after-all-5-20-26

01:05:42
WATCH: How the media weaponizes ‘trans’ (5.19.26)

A trans identity is embraced when sympathetic but ignored when problematic. Washington state spent millions on top and bottom surgeries for prisoners. Seattle mayor claims to regret “bye” comment. Feds charge woman for skid row election fraud.

Prefer to listen? https://audioboom.com/posts/8905576-how-the-media-weaponizes-trans-5-19-26

01:01:32
REMARKS: 'A fundamentally different approach to government'

These remarks were delivered to the Snohomish County Lincoln Day Dinner on May 17, 2024.

REMARKS: 'A fundamentally different approach to government'
'The Final Battle': Remarks to the Whatcom County Republican Party

The following remarks were delivered to the Whatcom County Lincoln Day Dinner on March 23, 2024, in Ferndale, Washington.

I struggled with what to talk to you about tonight. 

Well, that’s not true. I didn't struggle with what to talk to you about – I struggled with whether I was brave enough to say what I wanted to say. 

When I'm invited to speak to groups, I don't want to offend anyone or be too controversial. So, I reached out to a few of your fellow party members to ask whether any topics were off limits or wouldn't go over well with the crowd. 

I got some good advice. 

Then I decided to ignore that good advice entirely.

Too much is at stake to be polite. 

As we sit here tonight, we are in the final battle of a war. 

A war that has pit sanity against insanity. 

Pragmatism against idealism. 

A war that has sacrificed the public good, in favor of a twisted idea of progress.

It's a war that began long before I moved here 15 years ago. It started silently and it was mostly waged in the shadows.

Most of us didn't even realize that a war was being fought. We were too caught up in our own lives and our own problems. ...

'The Final Battle': Remarks to the Whatcom County Republican Party
INTERVIEW: Congressman Dan Newhouse

During a visit to Eastern Washington, Brandi sat down with Congressman Dan Newhouse (R-WA04) to discuss the fentanyl crisis, fuel costs, border security, Chinese land acquisition, and how he was able to survive his vote to impeach Donald Trump.

INTERVIEW: Congressman Dan Newhouse
LIVE: Arrested for keeping secrets (5.21.26)

A local public school superintendent faces a felony charge for allegedly trying to cover up allegations of student assaults. Congress does what Washington state won't do on parental rights. Democrats seem incapable of diagnosing why the party lost to Trump.

LIVE: Not forgotten after all (5.20.26)

Trump’s Department of Justice is targeting several radical policies in Washington state. State lawmaker faces public hearing in ethics probe. Activists demand Seattle mayor declare ‘emergency’ for trans refugees. Gavin Newsom is getting really, really scary.

post photo preview
We fight on – because what other choice is there?
They can try to destroy my reputation. It still won't put them on the right side of history.
 

This week, progressive political strategists launched an effort to undermine my support of citizen initiatives – arguing that my opinions are no longer protected by the First Amendment and should therefore be regulated by the state.

You read that correctly.

In a 24-page complaint to the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission, an obscure organization that styles itself as Washingtonians for Ethical Government called for an immediate investigation into my public support of two voter initiatives that will appear on the ballot in November – one to protect girls' sports, the other to restore parental rights.

Kruse is possibly the most prolific of political content creators in Washington, and her promotions of Let’s Go Washington’s initiatives do not qualify as editorial content. Kruse is not an impartial journalist or just an opinionated member of the public; she is a commercial advertiser with multiple advertisers. Although Kruse was once employed as a reporter by bonafide news outlets, she is no longer commonly considered as a journalist in Washington State and was recently denied press credentials by the Washington State Capitol Correspondents Association, a decision that was upheld by both state and federal courts.

Their argument goes something like this:

  • I host a podcast.

  • My podcast sells spots to advertisers.

  • I endorse products for said advertisers.

  • Therefore, my endorsements have value.

  • Therefore, my political endorsements have value.

  • Therefore, any political endorsements I make must be reported to the Public Disclosure Commission as “in-kind” donations.

There are several factual inaccuracies with the complaint, like the assertion that state and federal courts have determined I’m not a journalist. That is false. While a federal judge declined an emergency motion to have my press pass reinstated in the final days of the 2026 legislative session, our case is ongoing and only in the early stages. I am confident we will prevail.

There are also several legal issues with the complaint, not the least of which is a pesky little thing called the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

But don’t be fooled – the goal of the complaint isn’t for it to stick. The goal is to harm my reputation in the court of public opinion.

Still, for the sake of posterity, it’s worth noting a few things:

The government cannot assign a numerical value to my political speech. Such an act would be extraordinary and without precedent in the history of the United States.

I have never received anything of monetary value to support or oppose any political candidate, initiative, or issue. Quite the contrary. I have given untold hours, made personal donations, and driven tens of thousands of miles around the state to lend my voice to issues and people I believe in.

I have the right to charge advertisers for endorsements, or to provide endorsements free of charge if I wish. And I have. In the years following the pandemic, I featured local small businesses on my show free of charge – and gave them attention on social media, urging followers to support businesses that were struggling to recover from government-imposed lockdowns. I also did this in 2020 while still employed as a news reporter at FOX 13 in Seattle, running a weekly segment on my political show called “Small Business Sunday.”

Providing paid endorsements of products is a common practice in broadcasting and has been for decades. Many of our current advertisers were once endorsed on the radio by the late Dori Monson. Several local radio hosts who endorse products on air have also made public statements about their support of current voter initiatives. Ari Hoffman of KVI and John Curley of KIRO Radio not only endorse products but have stood alongside me in support of girls and parents.

If the Public Disclosure Commission were to rule that my speech must be regulated, it would also have to start regulating the speech of dozens of mainstream radio hosts – and perhaps even the Editorial Board of the Seattle Times.

Beyond that, this issue is settled law in Washington.

The Washington State Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that endorsements from talk show hosts do not constitute in-kind contributions.

At the time, radio hosts John Carlson and Kirby Wilbur were organizing and promoting Initiative 912, aimed at stopping an incremental increase in the gas tax.

'The mere fact that a broadcast has value to a campaign, or includes solicitation of funds, votes, or other support, does not convert commentary into advertising when it occurs during the content portion of a broadcast for which payment is not normally required,' Justice Barbara Madsen wrote for the court.

But again, the point of the complaint is not to upend existing law or get the government to throw the First Amendment to the wind.

The progressive political strategists behind the stunt, Powerhouse Strategic, is the firm used by opponents of the Let’s Go Washington initiatives.

Few news outlets that covered Tuesday’s press release saw fit to mention this connection. Why? It’s not as if it’s a secret. Kristin Hyde, a communications specialist with Powerhouse Strategic, sent the release out with her name and contact information on it.

Powerhouse not only brought previous PDC complaints against Let’s Go Washington, but it also represents the Washington State Democratic Party, as well as two of the largest unions bankrolling the anti-initiative campaigns: SEIU and the Washington Education Association.

1.png?token-hash=Rsuomg_82zpfRv9wDl5Yj5pls7-whh7ucO_ZK0G6vE8%3D&token-time=1779926400

Still, The Seattle Times characterized Washingtonians for Ethical Government (WFEG) only as a “campaign finance watchdog.”

Even if it were a legitimate watchdog group and not a cover for deeply partisan operatives, in the past 10 years it’s only ever questioned the “ethics” of conservatives.

1.png?token-hash=kEF0Gl5391E8QNe-c3xP0lSO4rvB-K86pbSiK_lUup0%3D&token-time=1779926400

In case there was any doubt, I fully intend to continue my work fighting for what I truly believe is the women’s rights issue of our generation: the erasure of girls at the hands of ideologues.

After all, I was fighting this issue long before Let’s Go Washington decided to run initiatives to change state law. In fact, it was through episodes of unDivided that LGW met two of the teen athletes – Ahnaleigh Wilson and Frances Staudt – who would go on to become important voices in the campaign to protect female athletes. I like to think our coverage of the issue is a big reason why voters will get a say in November. I am very proud of that.

1.jpg?token-hash=j3Zy8oY8oJaza2PZlQJDQgdNdSeRb2Z5ArWk7-muENI%3D&token-time=1779926400
Me with Frances Staudt (left) and Ahnaleigh Wilson (right) at a signature gathering event in Issaquah, Washington.

I will also keep fighting for parental rights, as I was before LGW started collecting signatures for a parental bill of rights. My advocacy on this issue goes back to 2023, when I helped a rag-tag group of citizens collect signatures to try to run a referendum on Senate Bill 5599. The law allows children to be hidden from parents if they don’t think their family approves of their gender identity. I was protested, threatened, and called a transphobe. All the usual stuff. The referendum fell short, but my motivation to help parents keep their families together only grew.

1.jpg?token-hash=g-4GoyPQwU1zwfq1NCZjpaAVuIv9Pne4dj5jOTCWOPQ%3D&token-time=1779926400
Protesters greet us outside a coffee shop in Lacey, Washington, where we were collecting signatures to repeal SB 5599.

As I said on my show this week: They can try to bankrupt my business. They can try to destroy my reputation. They can even try to kill me. None of it puts them on the right side of history.

So, we fight on. What other choice is there?

 

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Constitution Wars start NOW!
In response to Governor Bob Ferguson auctioning off a signed copy of the Constitution (blasphemy), we're auctioning off our own to the highest bidder! The winner will get a personalized inscription from Brandi, and she will hand deliver it (within 150 miles). All proceeds from the winning bid will go to We Heart Seattle, as selected by unDivided subscribers. Donations are tax deductible. Place your bid here.

Read full Article
post photo preview
Guest: How to investigate fraud when the media and politicians won't
How a citizen with an art degree uncovered more about potential childcare fraud than the legacy news

About the author: Kristen Magnuson is a Washington state resident and citizen sleuth who helped uncover a troubling pattern with childcare payments in Washington state that mimicked alleged fraud in Minnesota. Follow her work on X at @KristenMag.

 

 

On the morning of December 28, I settled in with a cup of coffee to catch up on the latest Minnesota fraud news. I’d heard rumblings of the scandal for weeks after County Highway and City Journal published pieces describing the schemes in startling detail.

Earlier that week, independent journalist Nick Shirley released a viral video investigating Minneapolis daycare centers, focusing on several owned and operated by members of the Somali community. His videos weren’t definitive proof of fraud, but like many Americans I was left with questions that were too big to ignore.

So, what was I going to do about it?

I’ve always had a knack for pattern recognition and making sense of data. I fully admit I’m not professionally trained in this capacity. I have an art degree. I’m just a concerned citizen who wanted to take a closer look at how our tax dollars are being spent.

Here’s how I went about uncovering suspicious activity that was later highlighted by Elon Musk, viewed by millions of people, and led to on-the-ground investigations by independent journalists (and even some legacy news stations in Seattle). 

It started with a simple search

My initial efforts were not sophisticated. I simply typed ‘childcare wa’ into a search engine. I never anticipated that such a basic exercise in sleuthing would spark the local and national attention that it did.

I landed on the state website for the Department of Children, Youth, and Families (DCYF). Among other things, the site serves as a tool for families to find childcare options. It lists every provider in the state, with information on the owner, address, capacity, inspection history, and language.

I toggled the filter to show daycares participating in the Early Achievers rating program, which is a requirement for receiving state funding. From there, I filtered results to show only the daycare operators listed as speaking Somali.

Is it racist to single out one ethnicity?

The Minnesota fraud scandal had already established a clear pattern of fraud within the Somali community, resulting in multiple prosecutions and guilty pleas.

It’s not racist to explore whether similar patterns might exist in other states, too.

Consider this excerpt from Armin Rosen’s County Highway piece:

If one chooses to inhabit a fact-based world, it is impossible to ignore that the most thoroughly proven frauds, the ones that have dollar amounts and dozens of federal prosecutions attached to them, involve the distribution of social services through organizations serving Somali-Americans.

In a City Journal article, Christopher Rufo highlighted a whistleblower who reported that the Minneapolis Somali fraud ring may have a potential link to Seattle.

According to Glenn Kerns, a retired Seattle Police Department detective who spent 14 years on a federal Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF), the Somalis ran a sophisticated money network, spanning from Seattle to Minneapolis, and were routing significant amounts of cash on commercial flights from the Seattle airport to the hawala networks in Somalia. One of these networks, Kerns discovered, sent $20 million abroad in a single year. 'The amount of money was staggering,' Kerns said.

Ignoring evidence and patterns over concerns about being called racist is how fraud goes unreported and uncovered.

In my initial search of Somali-run daycares in Washington state, I found that of 5,046 total Early Achievers childcare providers, 539 were Somali speaking. That’s more than 10%. Census reports estimate less than .2% of Washington state’s population is of Somali descent.

That seemed oddly disproportionate, so I posted a scrolling video on X to show what I found.

Hours later, I casually checked my notifications while at the grocery store and saw that Elon Musk replied! Millions of people were suddenly interested in what I’d uncovered with a simple search of publicly available data.

 

Day 1: Investigating on the ground

The day after my X post went viral, independent journalist Jonathan Choe pulled up to my house. We spent the next four hours driving all over town investigating daycares in person. I’d never done anything like it.

While state leaders, including Washington’s Attorney General and several Democrats in the legislature, would later accuse us of harassing daycare owners, we did no such thing. We were friendly. We knocked on doors. We politely asked for an application to enroll a child. Many of the people who came to the door were friendly in return.

At the first daycare, a woman invited us inside for a tour. There were activity tables with child-sized chairs, nap mats neatly stacked, art on the walls, age-appropriate books arranged on a shelf.

While everything looked legitimate, the woman would not give us an application, and I noted that only one child was present at the time.

As we ventured to other locations, we encountered some obvious red flags. Windows fully covered, no signage, and very few outdoor play areas. Most of the people who answered the door told us the owner was not there. They asked us to come back another time. Most significantly, we rarely saw or heard any kids.

At the last spot a woman spoke to us through a doorbell camera.

“We don’t have childcare,” she said.

The windows were fully covered.

 

Day 2: Trouble with the police

On our second day visiting Somali-run daycares listed on the state website, we met up with local journalist Carleen Johnson of The Center Square.

At one site, a woman spoke to us from behind a closed door. She wasn’t willing to give us an application. We asked a few more brief questions, thanked her, and started walking away. Shortly after, two women came out of the house to scold us.

Someone had called the police.

A responding officer assured us that we were not trespassing or doing anything wrong. The women allowed him to look inside the home, and he confirmed that there were kids inside.

The hostility was surprising. By then, a local KOMO News reporter was doing similar work – knocking on doors and asking questions. Basic shoe-leather journalism. Not harassment. Not racism.

We continued throughout the city. Some of the places we visited looked like real daycares, but many did not.

We detailed our findings on social media.

 

Day 3: Where has all the money gone?

We began looking deeper into the publicly available spending data on the Washington State Fiscal Information website. This site, also known as Open Checkbook, discloses provider payments by month and fiscal year. Our third day was focused on visits to providers that received significant amounts of funding.

Another independent journalist, Cam Higby, was with us as well.

Many of these small home daycares were receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayer funds each year – some got more than a million. Keep in mind that most of these daycares have a maximum capacity of 12 children.

At one address we visited, a man spoke to us from a porch camera. He told us it was not a daycare.

Another alleged daycare was listed at the address of a small, run-down house. The windows were covered. We didn’t see or hear any children. Besides a tattered basketball hoop sitting in a mud puddle at the edge of the property, there was no play equipment. The woman who answered the door was friendly but declined to provide us with any information or an application.

Our team asked two neighbors if they had seen kids at the house and if they were aware it was registered as a daycare.

Both neighbors said no.

Yet, according to state data, the childcare provider listed at that address receives six-figure monthly payments, bringing in over $160,000 in July alone.

As I expanded my research, I checked out the state’s most recent audit. The Washington State Auditor’s Office reviews federal funding annually. Findings are published in a formal report, with highlights summarized on the auditor’s website. The 2024 fiscal year audit exposed significant concerns, including a whopping $416 million dollars in “unauditable” DCYF spending.

The audit revealed that DCYF repeatedly failed to comply with reporting requirements and had more audit “findings” than any other agency.

Despite being given corrective actions to take, similar findings have plagued DCYF for years.

“For the fourth year in a row, we are questioning all childcare payments from the Child Care and Development Fund at the Department of Children, Youth, and Families,” the Auditor’s Office stated.

Read that again. The auditor’s office has questioned ALL federal childcare payments to DCYF for the past four years. Hundreds of millions of dollars in questionable payments.

How is such a blatant failure to follow reporting requirements or enact corrective action even allowed?

I posted a thread summarizing the audit findings on X. Before long, other news outlets and political figures were amplifying what I found.

The strange thing is that the audit findings were never private or hard to uncover. They were right there on a government website for all to see, for years. Why did it take a citizen with an art degree in Washington state to shed light on them?

Knowledge is power, but what comes next?

I want to be clear that I am not alleging fraud at any of these daycares. I do not have the tools or authority to do so. But we, as citizens, do have the tools to spot concerning patterns and question government oversight of our money.

Thanks to social media, we can amplify our concerns so that officials who do have the tools and authority to investigate can be pressured to do so.

State officials have seemingly ignored these red flags for years. Our questions and concerns are fair. We are not racists for recognizing patterns and asking questions.

Our elected officials owe us transparency – and if the media won’t demand it, we should.

About the author: Kristen Magnuson is a Washington state resident and citizen sleuth who helped uncover a troubling pattern with childcare payments in Washington state that mimicked alleged fraud in Minnesota. Follow her work on X at @KristenMag.

 

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals